These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10820682)

  • 1. Comparing personality scales across time: an illustrative study of validity and consistency in life-span archival data.
    Martin LR; Friedman HS
    J Pers; 2000 Feb; 68(1):85-110. PubMed ID: 10820682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].
    Courtois R; Petot JM; Lignier B; Lecocq G; Plaisant O
    Encephale; 2018 Jun; 44(3):208-214. PubMed ID: 28364967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing adolescents' personality with the NEO PI-R.
    De Fruyt F; Mervielde I; Hoekstra HA; Rolland JP
    Assessment; 2000 Dec; 7(4):329-45. PubMed ID: 11172584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Replicable item-cluster subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory.
    Saucier G
    J Pers Assess; 1998 Apr; 70(2):263-76. PubMed ID: 9697330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Substance or style? An investigation of the NEO-PI-R validity scales.
    Morey LC; Quigley BD; Sanislow CA; Skodol AE; McGlashan TH; Shea MT; Stout RL; Zanarini MC; Gunderson JG
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Dec; 79(3):583-99. PubMed ID: 12511022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research Validity Scales for the NEO-PI-R: additional evidence for reliability and validity.
    Young MS; Schinka JA
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Jun; 76(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 11499455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factor structure of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire and its relationship with the revised NEO personality inventory in a Japanese sample.
    Maruta T; Yamate T; Iimori M; Kato M; Livesley WJ
    Compr Psychiatry; 2006; 47(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 17067879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria.
    Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA; Berry DT
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Jun; 74(3):472-88. PubMed ID: 10900573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model.
    Maples JL; Guan L; Carter NT; Miller JD
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1070-84. PubMed ID: 24932643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personality traits measured by the Swedish universities Scales of Personality: factor structure and position within the five-factor model in an Estonian sample.
    Aluoja A; Voogne H; Maron E; Gustavsson JP; Võhma U; Shlik J
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2009; 63(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 19034803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Domain and facet personality predictors of all-cause mortality among Medicare patients aged 65 to 100.
    Weiss A; Costa PT
    Psychosom Med; 2005; 67(5):724-33. PubMed ID: 16204430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychometric properties and norm data of the Swedish version of the NEO-PI-R.
    Källmen H; Wennberg P; Bergman H
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2011 Oct; 65(5):311-4. PubMed ID: 21174492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement invariance of personality traits from a five-factor model perspective: multi-group confirmatory factor analyses of the HP5 inventory.
    Gustavsson JP; Eriksson AK; Hilding A; Gunnarsson M; Ostensson CG
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Oct; 49(5):459-67. PubMed ID: 18452498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the invalidity of validity scales: evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples.
    Piedmont RL; McCrae RR; Riemann R; Angleitner A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Mar; 78(3):582-93. PubMed ID: 10743882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six Personality Questionnaires.
    Thalmayer AG; Saucier G; Eigenhuis A
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Dec; 23(4):995-1009. PubMed ID: 21859221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The criterion-related validity of personality measures for predicting GPA: a meta-analytic validity competition.
    McAbee ST; Oswald FL
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Jun; 25(2):532-44. PubMed ID: 23397931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Personality assessment with the NEO-Five-Factor Inventory: the 30-Item-Short-Version (NEO-FFI-30)].
    Körner A; Geyer M; Roth M; Drapeau M; Schmutzer G; Albani C; Schumann S; Brähler E
    Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 2008 Jun; 58(6):238-45. PubMed ID: 17899495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of affective temperaments in Hungary: internal consistency and concurrent validity of the TEMPS-A against the TCI and NEO-PI-R.
    Rózsa S; Rihmer Z; Gonda X; Szili I; Rihmer A; Ko N; Németh A; Pestality P; Bagdy G; Alhassoon O; Akiskal KK; Akiskal HS
    J Affect Disord; 2008 Feb; 106(1-2):45-53. PubMed ID: 17706791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Internal and temporal reliability estimates for informant ratings of personality using the NEO PI-R and IAS. NEO Personality Inventory. Interpersonal Adjective Scales.
    Kurtz JE; Lee PA; Sherker JL
    Assessment; 1999 Jun; 6(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 10335016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Personality and mortality risk across the life span: the importance of conscientiousness as a biopsychosocial attribute.
    Martin LR; Friedman HS; Schwartz JE
    Health Psychol; 2007 Jul; 26(4):428-36. PubMed ID: 17605562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.