These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10821041)

  • 1. [Objective evaluation procedures in cases of possible diagnostic error].
    Knol A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 May; 144(19):908-9. PubMed ID: 10821041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Objective re-evaluation procedures in cases of possible diagnostic error].
    Giard RW; Broekman JM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Mar; 144(12):566-71. PubMed ID: 10746050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Doctors are increasingly held liable for missed diagnosis of cancer in mass screening].
    Giard RW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jun; 145(22):1074-8. PubMed ID: 11414170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Physician treatment error and legal ramifications] ].
    Gusek M
    Chirurg; 2007 Sep; Suppl():312-4. PubMed ID: 18409226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [From general practice of expert testimony: blood in stool always requires further diagnosis].
    Cyran W
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Aug; 87(8):673-7. PubMed ID: 8379206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analysis of expert reports from a general practice expert in disciplinary cases and malpractice claims against family practitioners (1994-2000): a lesson for clinical practice].
    Berend K
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Nov; 145(45):2195-6. PubMed ID: 11727623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnostic pitfall and diagnostic error from the malpractice viewpoint].
    Ostendorf GM
    Versicherungsmedizin; 2014 Jun; 66(2):102. PubMed ID: 25000634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Pitfalls of Rendering an Expert Opinion in Breast Malpractice Cases by Reviewing a CD-ROM.
    Brenner RJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Apr; 13(4):424-5. PubMed ID: 26768543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What to do when a misreading is discovered.
    Gagnon M
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2001 Feb; 52(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 11247260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Complaints and claims about obstetric care; expert testimony from one expert reported over 10 years (1984-1995)].
    Treffers PE
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1996 Jan; 140(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 8618646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The expert witness: understanding the rationale.
    Brenner RJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Sep; 4(9):612-6. PubMed ID: 17845966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Defending the pap smear: a proactive approach to the litigation threat in gynecologic cytology.
    McCoy DR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Nov; 114 Suppl():S52-8. PubMed ID: 11996170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The risk of medical error occurrence on holidays in the material of the Forensic Medicine Department, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, in the years 2000-2005].
    Chowaniec C; Chowaniec M; Nowak A; Jabłoński C
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 17571510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defending the "missed" radiographic diagnosis.
    Hall FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):471-3. PubMed ID: 11461891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Doctors are increasingly held liable for missed diagnosis of cancer in mass screening].
    De Rijke JM; Schouten LJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Sep; 145(36):1764. PubMed ID: 11572181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Analysis of expert reports from a general practice expert in disciplinary cases and malpractice claims against family practitioners (1994-2000): a lesson for clinical practice].
    de Melker RA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 May; 145(21):1019-23. PubMed ID: 11407279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Diagnostic error is not a professional violation].
    Kohlhaas M
    Hefte Unfallheilkd; 1970; 102():178-81. PubMed ID: 5472289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Missed mammographic abnormalities, malpractice, and expert witnesses: does majority rule in the courtroom?
    Berlin L
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):288; author reply 289. PubMed ID: 14519882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [False interpretation of laboratory results. In court it counts as a "significant diagnostic error"].
    Schlund GH
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2001 Jun; 143(24):46-8. PubMed ID: 11469020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Legal aspects of deadly acute appendicitis].
    Krukemeyer MG; Pflugmacher I; Püschel K
    Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Dec; 130(6):594-6. PubMed ID: 16382411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.