157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10822886)
21. Prediction of transverse maxillary dimension using orthodontic models.
de Oliveira MA; Pereira MD; Hino CT; Campaner AB; Scanavini MA; Ferreira LM
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1465-71. PubMed ID: 19098534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of dental and basal arch forms using cone-beam CT and 3D virtual models of normal occlusion.
Bayome M; Park JH; Han SH; Baek SH; Sameshima GT; Kook YA
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 23785937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Changes in mandibular interdental distance concurrent with rapid maxillary expansion.
Gryson JA
Angle Orthod; 1977 Jul; 47(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 332017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison between rapid and mixed maxillary expansion through an assessment of arch changes on dental casts.
Grassia V; d'Apuzzo F; Jamilian A; Femiano F; Favero L; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():20. PubMed ID: 26122076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dental arch diameters and relationships to oral habits.
Aznar T; Galán AF; Marín I; Domínguez A
Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 16637724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Thirty-two-year follow-up study of Herbst therapy: a biometric dental cast analysis.
Pancherz H; Bjerklin K; Lindskog-Stokland B; Hansen K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 24373651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Determination of the dental arch form in the primary dentition using a polynomial equation model.
Memarpour M; Oshagh M; Hematiyan MR
J Dent Child (Chic); 2012; 79(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 23433616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dentoalveolar development in subjects with normal occlusion. A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years.
Thilander B
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 19304760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dental arch dimensions in primary dentition of children aged three to five years in Chennai and Hyderabad.
Prabhakaran S; Sriram CH; Muthu MS; Chandrasekhar RR; Sivakumar N
Indian J Dent Res; 2006; 17(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 17217215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An evaluation of the curve of Spee in the maxilla and mandible of human permanent healthy dentitions.
Xu H; Suzuki T; Muronoi M; Ooya K
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):536-9. PubMed ID: 15583558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Spacing in deciduous dentition of Polish children in relation to tooth size and dental arch dimensions.
Janiszewska-Olszowska J; Stepien P; Syrynska M
Arch Oral Biol; 2009 May; 54(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 19251244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mixed dentition space analysis in a Thai population.
Jaroontham J; Godfrey K
Eur J Orthod; 2000 Apr; 22(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 10822885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Transverse skeletal and dentoalveolar changes during growth.
Hesby RM; Marshall SD; Dawson DV; Southard KA; Casko JS; Franciscus RG; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):721-31. PubMed ID: 17169734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interrelationship between the position of impacted maxillary canines and the morphology of the maxilla.
Kim Y; Hyun HK; Jang KT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 May; 141(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 22554749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The impact of playing wind musical instruments on the dental arch dimensions in a male west african population.
Adeyemi TE; Otuyemi OD
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 23(8):1120-1126. PubMed ID: 32788490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [A comparative study of the transverse dimensions of the dental arches between Class I dental occlusion and Class II1 and Class II2 malocclusions].
Halimi A; Azeroual MF; Abouqal R; Zaoui F
Odontostomatol Trop; 2011 Dec; 34(136):47-52. PubMed ID: 22457992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dental arch morphological and dimensional characteristics in Jordanian children and young adults with beta-thalassaemia major.
Al-Wahadni A; Qudeimat MA; Al-Omari M
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Mar; 15(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 15790366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantitative description of the morphology of the human palate by a mathematical equation.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Schmitz JH; Colombo A
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Sep; 35(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 9761557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of dental arch measurements in the primary dentition between contemporary and historic samples.
Warren JJ; Bishara SE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 11244414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The relationship between arch dimensions and the 5-year index in the primary dentition of patients with complete UCLP.
DiBiase AT; DiBiase DD; Hay NJ; Sommerlad BC
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Nov; 39(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 12401109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
