These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Initial contact angle measurements on variously treated dental/medical titanium materials. Lim YJ; Oshida Y Biomed Mater Eng; 2001; 11(4):325-41. PubMed ID: 11790864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of hydroxyapatite coating in resisting wear particle migration and osteolysis around acetabular components. Coathup MJ; Blackburn J; Goodship AE; Cunningham JL; Smith T; Blunn GW Biomaterials; 2005 Jul; 26(19):4161-9. PubMed ID: 15664643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of bleaching agents on surface free energy parameters of resin composite coated with saliva biofilm. Buzoglu HD; Gümüsderelioğlu M; Rotstein I Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 19824559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating on the osteoconductivity of commercially pure titanium implants. Strnad Z; Strnad J; Povýsil C; Urban K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 10960980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the osseointegration of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae. Jung YC; Han CH; Lee IS; Kim HE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):809-18. PubMed ID: 11769831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur. Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surface characterizations of variously treated titanium materials. Lim YJ; Oshida Y; Andres CJ; Barco MT Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 11432653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histomorphometric evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and thin ion beam-deposited bioceramic surfaces: an experimental study in dogs. Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Coelho PG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 19231787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits. London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of different finishing and polishing agents on the surface roughness of cast pure titanium. Reddy ES; Patil NP; Guttal SS; Jagadish HG J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 17451480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants. Schliephake H; Scharnweber D; Roesseler S; Dard M; Sewing A; Aref A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 17066635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs. Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types. Kohles SS; Clark MB; Brown CA; Kenealy JN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 15346747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep. Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up. Schwartz-Arad D; Mardinger O; Levin L; Kozlovsky A; Hirshberg A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15839117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo. Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report. Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]