165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10823073)
1. Water storage effect on the marginal seal of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
Irie M; Suzuki K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 10823073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal seal of resin-modified glass ionomers and compomers: effect of delaying polishing procedure after one-day storage.
Irie M; Suzuki K
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):488-96. PubMed ID: 11203861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of delayed polishing on gap formation of cervical restorations.
Irie M; Suzuki K
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 11817470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of spherical silica additions on marginal gaps and compressive strength of experimental glass-ionomer cements.
Irie M; Nagaoka N; Tamada Y; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Minagi S; Finger WJ
Am J Dent; 2011 Oct; 24(5):310-4. PubMed ID: 22165460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of delayed polishing periods on interfacial gap formation of Class V restorations.
Irie M; Tjandrawinata R; Suzuki K
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 14531601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Class I gap-formation in highly-viscous glass-ionomer restorations: delayed vs immediate polishing.
Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 18435195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of desiccation on microleakage of five Class 5 restorative materials.
Bouschlicher MR; Vargas MA; Denehy GE
Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):90-5. PubMed ID: 9002867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Root-surface gap-formation with RMGIC restorations minimized by reduced P/L ratio of the first increment and delayed polishing.
Irie M; Tjandrawinata R; Suzuki K; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2006 May; 22(5):486-97. PubMed ID: 16225915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material: an investigation of placement techniques.
Köprülü H; Gürgan S; Onen A
Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):729-32. PubMed ID: 8935116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of maturity and dehydration shrinkage on resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
Sidhu SK; Sherriff M; Watson TF
J Dent Res; 1997 Aug; 76(8):1495-501. PubMed ID: 9240386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry.
Nicholson JW; Croll TP
Quintessence Int; 1997 Nov; 28(11):705-14. PubMed ID: 9573860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal sealability of resin-modified glass ionomers for base/liner: effect of hygroscopic expansion and bond strength.
Irie M; Nakai H
Dent Mater J; 1996 Dec; 15(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 9550017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations.
Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate versus water-storage performance of Class V flowable composite restoratives.
Irie M; Hatanaka K; Suzuki K; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2006 Sep; 22(9):875-83. PubMed ID: 16837038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temperature mediated coefficient of dimensional change of dental tooth-colored restorative materials.
Sidhu SK; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 15081549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
