212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10823137)
1. Completeness of excision and follow up cytology in patients treated with loop excision biopsy.
Zaitoun AM; McKee G; Coppen MJ; Thomas SM; Wilson PO
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Mar; 53(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 10823137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cytological follow-up of women older than 50 years with high-grade cervical smear treated by large loop excision.
Das N; Sutton V; Bevan J; Brinkmann D; Woolas R
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jul; 13(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 19550214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Gardeil F; Barry-Walsh C; Prendiville W; Clinch J; Turner MJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Mar; 89(3):419-22. PubMed ID: 9052597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of recurrence after treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of human papillomavirus testing and age at conisation.
Verguts J; Bronselaer B; Donders G; Arbyn M; Van Eldere J; Drijkoningen M; Poppe W
BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1303-7. PubMed ID: 16978225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low recurrence rate of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful excision and routine colposcopy during follow-up.
Lili E; Chatzistamatiou K; Kalpaktsidou-Vakiani A; Moysiadis T; Agorastos T
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jan; 97(4):e9719. PubMed ID: 29369205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Invasive cervical cancer after treatment of CIN.
Herbert A; Culora G; McLean E; Kubba AA;
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(6):324-332. PubMed ID: 31523013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cytology of atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): histological results and recurrence after a loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Nogara PR; Manfroni LA; Consolaro ME
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Oct; 284(4):965-71. PubMed ID: 21052702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of Early Cervical Stromal Invasion FIGO Stage 1A1 When Margins Are Involved With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Nicholson RC; Twigg J; Roberts A; Angelopoulos G; Cruickshank D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2018 Apr; 22(2):129-131. PubMed ID: 29474238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arbyn M; Redman CWE; Verdoodt F; Kyrgiou M; Tzafetas M; Ghaem-Maghami S; Petry KU; Leeson S; Bergeron C; Nieminen P; Gondry J; Reich O; Moss EL
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Dec; 18(12):1665-1679. PubMed ID: 29126708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endocervical crypt involvement by high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and its association with high-grade histopathological recurrence after cervical excision in women with negative excision margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Papoutsis D; Underwood M; Parry-Smith W; Tzavara C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Mar; 309(3):939-948. PubMed ID: 37821642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia following large loop excision of the transformation zone.
Hulman G; Pickles CJ; Gie CA; Dowling FM; Stocks PJ; Dixon R
J Clin Pathol; 1998 May; 51(5):375-7. PubMed ID: 9708204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Management of stage Ia1 squamous cervical cancer and the importance of excision margins: a retrospective study of long-term outcome after 25 years of follow-up.
Papakonstantinou K; Kyrgiou M; Lyons D; Soutter WP; Ghaem-Maghami S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):625.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24949540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors affecting outcome after incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Paraskevaidis E; Kalantaridou SN; Paschopoulos M; Zikopoulos K; Diakomanolis E; Dalkalitsis N; Makrydimas G; Pappa L; Malamou-Mitsi V; Agnantis NJ
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(6):541-3. PubMed ID: 14658599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treatment in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-positive women.
Shah S; Montgomery H; Crow JC; Smith CJ; Moore A; Sabin CA; Evans H; Johnson MA
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 18569480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
