BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10824650)

  • 21. The Bournewood judgment: a way forward?
    Dickenson D; Shah A
    Med Sci Law; 1999 Oct; 39(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 10581905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Situating dementia in the experience of old age: Reconstructing legal response.
    Hall MI
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101468. PubMed ID: 31706378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The relation between autonomy-based rights and profoundly mentally disabled persons.
    Cantor NL
    Ann Health Law; 2004; 13(1):37-80, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15002181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Suffrage for People with Intellectual Disabilities and Mental Illness: Observations on a Civic Controversy.
    Kopel C
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2017; 17(1):209-250. PubMed ID: 29756757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Non-consensual sterilization of the adult with learning disabilities.
    Knifton C
    Br J Nurs; 1998 Oct 22-Nov 11; 7(19):1172-6. PubMed ID: 9866467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Research participation by people with intellectual disability and mental health issues: an examination of the processes of consent.
    Taua C; Neville C; Hepworth J
    Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2014 Dec; 23(6):513-24. PubMed ID: 24891249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Research involving adults who lack capacity: how have research ethics committees interpreted the requirements?
    Dixon-Woods M; Angell EL
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 19482983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The conflation of competence and capacity in english medical law: a philosophical critique.
    Bielby P
    Med Health Care Philos; 2005; 8(3):357-69. PubMed ID: 16283499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An international comparison of legal frameworks for supported and substitute decision-making in mental health services.
    Davidson G; Brophy L; Campbell J; Farrell SJ; Gooding P; O'Brien AM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 44():30-40. PubMed ID: 26318975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Incapacitated persons - participation rights and the legal concept of the capacity to consent].
    Damm R
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2016 Sep; 59(9):1075-84. PubMed ID: 27503499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inclusion of patients with severe mental illness in clinical trials: issues and recommendations surrounding informed consent.
    Welie SP; Berghmans RL
    CNS Drugs; 2006; 20(1):67-83. PubMed ID: 16396525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rights not restrictions for learning disabled adults: a response to Spiecker and Steutel.
    Leicester M; Cooke P
    J Moral Educ; 2002 Jun; 31(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 15027441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception.
    Coverdale JH; Bayer TL; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1993 Jul; 44(7):671-4. PubMed ID: 8354506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Informed consent in a vulnerable population group: supporting individuals aging with intellectual disability to participate in developing their own health and support programs.
    Wark S; MacPhail C; McKay K; Müeller A
    Aust Health Rev; 2017 Aug; 41(4):436-442. PubMed ID: 27537279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. 'Mental retardation' or 'intellectual disability': time for a conceptual change.
    Salvador-Carulla L; Bertelli M
    Psychopathology; 2008; 41(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 17952016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Providing dental care to patients with developmental disabilities: medical/legal issues.
    Romer M; Filanova V
    N Y State Dent J; 2006; 72(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 16711591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Psychological and legal aspects of mental incompetence.
    Ahmed MB
    Tex Med; 1998 Mar; 94(3):64-7. PubMed ID: 9529970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The capacity to refuse psychiatric treatment: a guide to the law for clinicians and tribunal members.
    Ryan C; Callaghan S; Peisah C
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2015 Apr; 49(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 25690742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does my patient have capacity to consent to treatment?
    Bird S
    Aust Fam Physician; 2004 Aug; 33(8):638-9. PubMed ID: 15373383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cognitive models of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Earnst KS; Marson DC; Harrell LE
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 Aug; 48(8):919-27. PubMed ID: 10968295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.