188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10825877)
1. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment.
Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC; Heymann HO
J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(4):206-14. PubMed ID: 10825877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue.
Guess PC; Vagkopoulou T; Zhang Y; Wolkewitz M; Strub JR
J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 24161516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the Crystallization Firing Process on Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Silicate-based Glass-ceramic Inlays Fabricated With a CAD/CAM Chairside System.
Kobayashi M; Niizuma Y; Sugai R; Manabe A
Oper Dent; 2023 Nov; 48(6):657-665. PubMed ID: 37882476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Micro-CT Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Crown and Inlay Restorations Fabricated Via Different Digital Scanners belonging to the Same CAD-CAM System.
Ekici Z; Kılıçarslan MA; Bilecenoğlu B; Ocak M
Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(3):381–389. PubMed ID: 33751000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Marginal fit of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays].
Chen Y; Zhao Y; Wang H
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 15(4):317-8, 327. PubMed ID: 11479977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Chairside CAD/CAM Restoration Type on Marginal Fit Accuracy: A Comparison of Crown, Inlay and Onlay Restorations.
Merrill TC; Mackey T; Luc R; Lung D; Naseem A; Abduo J
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 May; 29(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 33393741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC 2 CAD-CIM inlays.
Mörmann WH; Schug J
J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Jan; 128(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 9002401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Influence of cavity design on quality of margin and marginal adaptation and microleakage of all-ceramic CAD/CAM inlays].
Zhao SM; Wang XY
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Dec; 55(6):1105-1110. PubMed ID: 38101796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance.
Siervo S; Pampalone A; Siervo P; Siervo R
Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):773-9. PubMed ID: 7568682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments.
Sandoval MJ; Rocca GT; Krejci I; Mandikos M; Dietschi D
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Dec; 19(9):2167-77. PubMed ID: 25877233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique.
Lima FF; Neto CF; Rubo JH; Santos GC; Moraes Coelho Santos MJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of camera angulation on adaptation of CAD/CAM restorations.
Parsell DE; Anderson BC; Livingston HM; Rudd JI; Tankersley JD
J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 11326507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements.
Krejci I; Lutz F; Reimer M
Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 8008821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs. CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlays using a milling unit prototype.
Reich S; Gozdowski S; Trentzsch L; Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):644-50. PubMed ID: 19051857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. An in vitro study.
Sjögren G
Acta Odontol Scand; 1995 Feb; 53(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 7740927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study.
Heymann HO; Bayne SC; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Roberson TM
J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1171-81. PubMed ID: 8803392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities.
Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Folwaczny M; Hickel R
J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 15536855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays.
Fasbinder DJ; Dennison JB; Heys DR; Lampe K
J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Dec; 136(12):1714-23. PubMed ID: 16383055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
