These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10825877)

  • 1. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment.
    Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC; Heymann HO
    J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(4):206-14. PubMed ID: 10825877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue.
    Guess PC; Vagkopoulou T; Zhang Y; Wolkewitz M; Strub JR
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 24161516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the Crystallization Firing Process on Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Silicate-based Glass-ceramic Inlays Fabricated With a CAD/CAM Chairside System.
    Kobayashi M; Niizuma Y; Sugai R; Manabe A
    Oper Dent; 2023 Nov; 48(6):657-665. PubMed ID: 37882476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Micro-CT Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Crown and Inlay Restorations Fabricated Via Different Digital Scanners belonging to the Same CAD-CAM System.
    Ekici Z; Kılıçarslan MA; Bilecenoğlu B; Ocak M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(3):381–389. PubMed ID: 33751000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Marginal fit of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays].
    Chen Y; Zhao Y; Wang H
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 15(4):317-8, 327. PubMed ID: 11479977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Chairside CAD/CAM Restoration Type on Marginal Fit Accuracy: A Comparison of Crown, Inlay and Onlay Restorations.
    Merrill TC; Mackey T; Luc R; Lung D; Naseem A; Abduo J
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 May; 29(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 33393741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC 2 CAD-CIM inlays.
    Mörmann WH; Schug J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Jan; 128(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 9002401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Influence of cavity design on quality of margin and marginal adaptation and microleakage of all-ceramic CAD/CAM inlays].
    Zhao SM; Wang XY
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Dec; 55(6):1105-1110. PubMed ID: 38101796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance.
    Siervo S; Pampalone A; Siervo P; Siervo R
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):773-9. PubMed ID: 7568682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments.
    Sandoval MJ; Rocca GT; Krejci I; Mandikos M; Dietschi D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Dec; 19(9):2167-77. PubMed ID: 25877233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique.
    Lima FF; Neto CF; Rubo JH; Santos GC; Moraes Coelho Santos MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of camera angulation on adaptation of CAD/CAM restorations.
    Parsell DE; Anderson BC; Livingston HM; Rudd JI; Tankersley JD
    J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 11326507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Reimer M
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 8008821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs. CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlays using a milling unit prototype.
    Reich S; Gozdowski S; Trentzsch L; Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):644-50. PubMed ID: 19051857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. An in vitro study.
    Sjögren G
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1995 Feb; 53(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 7740927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study.
    Heymann HO; Bayne SC; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Roberson TM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1171-81. PubMed ID: 8803392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities.
    Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Folwaczny M; Hickel R
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 15536855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays.
    Fasbinder DJ; Dennison JB; Heys DR; Lampe K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Dec; 136(12):1714-23. PubMed ID: 16383055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.