These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10826392)

  • 1. The backpack run test: a model for a fair and occupationally relevant military fitness test.
    Vanderburgh PM; Flanagan S
    Mil Med; 2000 May; 165(5):418-21. PubMed ID: 10826392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Load-carriage distance run and push-ups tests: no body mass bias and occupationally relevant.
    Vanderburgh PM; Mickley NS; Anloague PA
    Mil Med; 2011 Sep; 176(9):1032-6. PubMed ID: 21987962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Body mass index predicts selected physical fitness attributes but is not associated with performance on military relevant tasks in U.S. Army Soldiers.
    Pierce JR; DeGroot DW; Grier TL; Hauret KG; Nindl BC; East WB; McGurk MS; Jones BH
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S79-S84. PubMed ID: 28919497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physiological variables and performance markers of serving soldiers from two "elite" units of the British Army.
    Simpson RJ; Gray SC; Florida-James GD
    J Sports Sci; 2006 Jun; 24(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 16611570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blood lactate thresholds and walking/running economy are determinants of backpack-running performance in trained soldiers.
    Simpson RJ; Graham SM; Connaboy C; Clement R; Pollonini L; Florida-James GD
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():566-572. PubMed ID: 27154276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical fitness profile of Army ROTC cadets.
    Thomas DQ; Lumpp SA; Schreiber JA; Keith JA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2004 Nov; 18(4):904-7. PubMed ID: 15574107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reliability of the 20 meter shuttle run test in military personnel.
    Aandstad A; Holme I; Berntsen S; Anderssen SA
    Mil Med; 2011 May; 176(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 21634295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The 1-mile walk test is a valid predictor of VO(2max) and is a reliable alternative fitness test to the 1.5-mile run in U.S. Air Force males.
    Weiglein L; Herrick J; Kirk S; Kirk EP
    Mil Med; 2011 Jun; 176(6):669-73. PubMed ID: 21702386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of Self-Reported Physical Fitness and Body Mass Index in a Military Population.
    Martin RC; Grier T; Canham-Chervak M; Anderson MK; Bushman TT; DeGroot DW; Jones BH
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Jan; 30(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 26683633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occupational relevance and body mass bias in military physical fitness tests.
    Vanderburgh PM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Aug; 40(8):1538-45. PubMed ID: 18614935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceived exertion and heart rate models for estimating metabolic workload in elite British soldiers performing a backpack load-carriage task.
    Simpson RJ; Graham SM; Florida-James GD; Connaboy C; Clement R; Jackson AS
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2010 Oct; 35(5):650-6. PubMed ID: 20962921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors of trainability and predictability associated with military physical fitness test success.
    Cuddy JS; Slivka DR; Hailes WS; Ruby BC
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Dec; 25(12):3486-94. PubMed ID: 22080323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-mile run performance and cardiovascular fitness in children.
    Rowland T; Kline G; Goff D; Martel L; Ferrone L
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1999 Aug; 153(8):845-9. PubMed ID: 10437758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-validation of an equating method linking aerobic FITNESSGRAM® field tests.
    Boiarskaia EA; Boscolo MS; Zhu W; Mahar MT
    Am J Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 41(4 Suppl 2):S124-30. PubMed ID: 21961612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concept for a Predeployment Assessment of Basic Military Fitness in the German Armed Forces.
    Rohde U; Sievert A; Rüther T; Witzki A; Leyk D
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S211-5. PubMed ID: 26506190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between the 2.4-km run and multistage shuttle run test performance in military personnel.
    Wilkinson DM; Blacker SD; Richmond VL; Rayson MP; Bilzon JL
    Mil Med; 2014 Feb; 179(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 24491618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of a Law Enforcement Academy Training Program on Validated Fitness Outcomes of Cadets.
    Martinez GJ; Abel MG
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Apr; 35(4):955-962. PubMed ID: 33555831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Running economy and energy cost of running with backpacks.
    Scheer V; Cramer L; Heitkamp HC
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2019 Apr; 59(4):555-560. PubMed ID: 29722253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correction factors for body mass bias in military physical fitness tests.
    Vanderburgh PM
    Mil Med; 2007 Jul; 172(7):738-42. PubMed ID: 17691687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Circumference-estimated percent body fat vs. weight-height indices: relationships to physical fitness.
    Conway TL; Cronan TA; Peterson KA
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1989 May; 60(5):433-7. PubMed ID: 2730487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.