190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10827680)
1. Critical appraisal. 8. Appraising qualitative research.
Thompson C
NT Learn Curve; 1999 Nov; 3(9):7-9. PubMed ID: 10827680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How to critique qualitative research articles.
Forchuk C; Roberts J
Can J Nurs Res; 1993; 25(4):47-55; quiz 56. PubMed ID: 10603806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The qualitative research methodology.
Saddler D
Gastroenterol Nurs; 2008; 31(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18300830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Developing critical appraisal skills.
McCaughan D
Prof Nurse; 1999 Sep; 14(12):843-7. PubMed ID: 10603895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Part II. rigour in qualitative research: complexities and solutions.
Tuckett AG
Nurse Res; 2005; 13(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16220839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating qualitative research studies.
Pickler RH
J Pediatr Health Care; 2007; 21(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 17478311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Value of qualitative research in nursing practices].
Formarier M
Rech Soins Infirm; 2000 Jun; (61):23-30. PubMed ID: 12037859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Criteria of scientific validity in research].
Pelletier C; Pagé G
Rech Soins Infirm; 2002 Mar; (68):35-42. PubMed ID: 12001625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Verbicide.
Boyd J
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2008 Oct; 15(8):695-8. PubMed ID: 18803746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Methodological quality of qualitative studies--potential measures].
Smaling A
Verpleegkunde; 1996 Nov; 11(4):240-54. PubMed ID: 9516822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human becoming criticism: a knowledge innovation.
Pilkington FB
Nurs Sci Q; 2004 Apr; 17(2):102. PubMed ID: 15090081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Qualitative research articles: information for authors and peer reviewers.
Rowan M; Huston P
CMAJ; 1997 Nov; 157(10):1442-6. PubMed ID: 9371080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring the audit trail for qualitative investigations.
Wolf ZR
Nurse Educ; 2003; 28(4):175-8. PubMed ID: 12878896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review of nursing research proposals.
Lindquist RD; Tracy MF; Treat-Jacobson D
Am J Crit Care; 1995 Jan; 4(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7894558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to assess rigour . . . or not in qualitative papers.
Sale JE
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):912-3. PubMed ID: 19018925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reviewing a manuscript for publication: how do I do this?
Koop PP
Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10703301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the reviewers of animal research.
Rollin BE; Loew FM
Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5548):1831-2. PubMed ID: 11732546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed.
Crowe M; Sheppard L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 64(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 21130354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Content analysis: method, applications, and issues.
Downe-Wamboldt B
Health Care Women Int; 1992; 13(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 1399871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grant reviews: how to do them well.
Koop PM
Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 10703294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
