232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10828894)
1. Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?
Amoore JN; Scott DH
Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 10828894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models.
Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 16019880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simulation study of the consistency of oscillometric blood pressure measurements with and without artefacts.
Amoore JN
Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 10828893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative evaluation of the DINAMAP 8100 and DINAMAP Compact TS using a non-invasive blood pressure simulator.
Amoore JN
Blood Press Monit; 1998 Oct; 3(5):309-314. PubMed ID: 10212371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extracting oscillometric pulses from the cuff pressure: does it affect the pressures determined by oscillometric blood pressure monitors?
Amoore JN
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 16932036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Propaq Neonatal monitor used with its own single- or with Critikon twin-hose cuffs: does it matter?
Amoore JN
Blood Press Monit; 1997 Dec; 2(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 10234090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-cost oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure monitors: device repeatability and device differences.
Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
Physiol Meas; 2005 Aug; 26(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 15886439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the A&D UA-767 and Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs noninvasive blood pressure monitors using a blood pressure simulator.
Davis PD; Dennis JL; Railton R
J Hum Hypertens; 2005 Mar; 19(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 15565174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement used for calibration of the arterial tonometry method contributes significantly to error.
Hansen S; Staber M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Sep; 23(9):781-7. PubMed ID: 16723049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Arterial blood pressure measurement with oscillometric instruments in newborns and infants].
Papadopoulos G; Oldörp B; Mieke S
Anaesthesist; 1994 Jul; 43(7):441-6. PubMed ID: 8092453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of an oscillometric blood pressure monitor during phenylephrine-induced hypertension in dogs.
McMurphy RM; Stoll MR; McCubrey R
Am J Vet Res; 2006 Sep; 67(9):1541-5. PubMed ID: 16948598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of three oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure simulators.
Amoore JN; Geake WB
J Clin Eng; 1997; 22(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 10166510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure measurements recorded by different revisions of the Philips Component Monitoring System.
Murray IC; Amoore JN; Scott DH
Blood Press Monit; 2005 Aug; 10(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 16077268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Errors of oscillometric blood pressure measurement as predicted by simulation.
Raamat R; Talts J; Jagomägi K; Kivastik J
Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):238-45. PubMed ID: 21914985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of oscillometric noninvasive blood pressure measurement devices using simulators.
Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Vacher E; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):251-3. PubMed ID: 17760217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke.
Manios E; Vemmos K; Tsivgoulis G; Barlas G; Koroboki E; Spengos K; Zakopoulos N
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 17496464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
