208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10831697)
1. Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities--report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group.
Tempany CM; Zou KH; Silverman SG; Brown DL; Kurtz AB; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 10831697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis--report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group.
Kurtz AB; Tsimikas JV; Tempany CM; Hamper UM; Arger PH; Bree RL; Wechsler RJ; Francis IR; Kuhlman JE; Siegelman ES; Mitchell DG; Silverman SG; Brown DL; Sheth S; Coleman BG; Ellis JH; Kurman RJ; Caudry DJ; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 10405715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis and staging of primary ovarian cancer: correlation between PET/CT, Doppler US, and CT or MRI.
Nam EJ; Yun MJ; Oh YT; Kim JW; Kim JH; Kim S; Jung YW; Kim SW; Kim YT
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 19926121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma.
Liu J; Xu Y; Wang J
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 62(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 17433597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Necrosis in metastatic neck nodes: diagnostic accuracy of CT, MR imaging, and US.
King AD; Tse GM; Ahuja AT; Yuen EH; Vlantis AC; To EW; van Hasselt AC
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 14990838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT and MR imaging in the staging of colorectal carcinoma: report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group II.
Zerhouni EA; Rutter C; Hamilton SR; Balfe DM; Megibow AJ; Francis IR; Moss AA; Heiken JP; Tempany CM; Aisen AM; Weinreb JC; Gatsonis C; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):443-51. PubMed ID: 8685340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT and MR imaging in the local staging of primary malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group.
Panicek DM; Gatsonis C; Rosenthal DI; Seeger LL; Huvos AG; Moore SG; Caudry DJ; Palmer WE; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 1997 Jan; 202(1):237-46. PubMed ID: 8988217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of hepatic metastases: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus unenhanced MR imaging and CT during arterial portography.
Senéterre E; Taourel P; Bouvier Y; Pradel J; Van Beers B; Daures JP; Pringot J; Mathieu D; Bruel JM
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):785-92. PubMed ID: 8756932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation - ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Coakley FV; Snyder B; Reinhold C; Schwartz LH; Woodward PJ; Pannu HK; Amendola M; Mitchell DG
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 17940305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.
Yuan Y; Gu ZX; Tao XF; Liu SY
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):1002-6. PubMed ID: 21349672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hepatic lesion detection: comparison of MR imaging after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide with dual-phase CT by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Ward J; Naik KS; Guthrie JA; Wilson D; Robinson PJ
Radiology; 1999 Feb; 210(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 10207430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incremental value of liver MR imaging in patients with potentially curable colorectal hepatic metastasis detected at CT: a prospective comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging, and a combination of both MR techniques.
Kim HJ; Lee SS; Byun JH; Kim JC; Yu CS; Park SH; Kim AY; Ha HK
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):712-22. PubMed ID: 25286324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis.
Bipat S; Glas AS; Slors FJ; Zwinderman AH; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):773-83. PubMed ID: 15273331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients undergoing liver resection: comparison of US, CT, T1-weighted dual-echo MR imaging, and point-resolved 1H MR spectroscopy.
van Werven JR; Marsman HA; Nederveen AJ; Smits NJ; ten Kate FJ; van Gulik TM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):159-68. PubMed ID: 20574093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-small cell lung cancer: whole-body MR examination for M-stage assessment--utility for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging compared with integrated FDG PET/CT.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Onishi Y; Takenaka D; Nogami M; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Kotani Y; Sugimura K
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):643-54. PubMed ID: 18539889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT and MR imaging in staging non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: report of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group.
Webb WR; Gatsonis C; Zerhouni EA; Heelan RT; Glazer GM; Francis IR; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):705-13. PubMed ID: 1847239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, contrast-enhanced US, superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI, and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.
Muhi A; Ichikawa T; Motosugi U; Sou H; Nakajima H; Sano K; Sano M; Kato S; Kitamura T; Fatima Z; Fukushima K; Iino H; Mori Y; Fujii H; Araki T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Aug; 34(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 21780227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ovarian cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging.
Forstner R; Hricak H; Occhipinti KA; Powell CB; Frankel SD; Stern JL
Radiology; 1995 Dec; 197(3):619-26. PubMed ID: 7480729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Liver lesions: manganese-enhanced MR and dual-phase helical CT for preoperative detection and characterization comparison with receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Braga HJ; Choti MA; Lee VS; Paulson EK; Siegelman ES; Bluemke DA
Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):525-31. PubMed ID: 11997563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation.
Ng SH; Yen TC; Liao CT; Chang JT; Chan SC; Ko SF; Wang HM; Wong HF
J Nucl Med; 2005 Jul; 46(7):1136-43. PubMed ID: 16000282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
