245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10831970)
21. Cytology and curetting diagnosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Bruehl FK; Dyhdalo KS; Hou Y; Clapacs E; Przybycin CG; Reynolds JP
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):556-562. PubMed ID: 32624383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A critical evaluation of the endocervical curettage.
Spirtos NM; Schlaerth JB; d'Ablaing G; Morrow CP
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):729-33. PubMed ID: 3658281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Endocervical curettage: does it contribute to the management of patients with abnormal cervical cytology?
Oyer R; Hanjani P
Gynecol Oncol; 1986 Oct; 25(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 3758830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Some observations on the value of endocervical curettage performed as an integral part of colposcopic examination of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
Urcuyo R; Rome RM; Nelson JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Aug; 128(7):787-92. PubMed ID: 879246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Histopathologic status of endocervical canal epithelium in CIN changes localized to the ectocervix].
Nowakowska G; Jaszczyński P; Olesiak E; Dziobek K; Golański B
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 10375928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Colposcopic screening of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears.
Kohan S; Noumoff J; Beckman EM; Morris M; Weiner E; Douglas GW
J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 4009560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A retrospective analysis on 1901 women with high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by colposcopic biopsy.
Zhang X; Dou Y; Wang M; Li Y; Wang F; Xie X; Wang X
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Oct; 217():53-58. PubMed ID: 28850822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
Hunter V; Tseng P
J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Utility of Endocervical Sampling at Time of Colposcopy when Referral Cytology Is Low Grade or Better.
Pierson RC; Johnson BE; Voirol JR; Kasper KM
Reprod Sci; 2020 Jan; 27(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 32046412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies.
Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Duggan BD; Roman LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):996-1000. PubMed ID: 7970484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of atypical and low-grade cervical cytology in private practice.
Nyirjesy I; Billingsley FS; Forman MR
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):601-7. PubMed ID: 9764636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Colposcopy Standards: Guidelines for Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy.
Massad LS; Perkins RB; Naresh A; Nelson EL; Spiryda L; Gecsi KS; Mulhem E; Kostas-Polston E; Zou T; Giles TL; Wentzensen N
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2023 Jan; 27(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 36222824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Endocervical curetting vs. endocervical brushing as case finding methods.
Maksem JA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 May; 34(5):313-6. PubMed ID: 16604549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The value of endocervical curettage in the management of the patient with abnormal cervical cytologic findings.
Grainger DA; Roberts DK; Wells MM; Horbelt DV
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 156(3):625-8. PubMed ID: 3826211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Squamous intraepithelial lesions arising in benign endocervical polyps: a report of 9 cases with correlation to the Pap smears, HPV analysis, and immunoprofile.
Chin N; Platt AB; Nuovo GJ
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2008 Oct; 27(4):582-90. PubMed ID: 18753960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diverse glandular pathologies coexist with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cyto-histological review of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep specimens.
Kumar N; Bongiovanni M; Molliet MJ; Pelte MF; Egger JF; Pache JC
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):351-8. PubMed ID: 18522633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Endocervical sampling using brush versus curette: a single centre experience and literature review.
Mitric C; Lakabi R; Kligun G; Matanes E; Lau S; Gotlieb WH; Salvador S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 43(1):2162866. PubMed ID: 36689210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Low-grade Papanicolaou smears and the Bethesda system: a prospective cytohistopathologic analysis.
Lonky NM; Navarre GL; Saunders S; Sadeghi M; Wolde-Tsadik G
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 85(5 Pt 1):716-20. PubMed ID: 7724102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantifying the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with unsatisfactory colposcopy results.
Massad LS; Tate N; Cejtin E; Collins YC
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15870518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
