BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10832433)

  • 1. [Surrogate and true endpoints in cancer clinical trials].
    Nakajima T; Ohta K; Ohyama S; Yamaguchi T
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2000 May; 27(5):671-5. PubMed ID: 10832433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Correlation between response and survival].
    Ohtsu A; Boku N; Miyata Y; Ohkuwa M
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2000 May; 27(5):689-95. PubMed ID: 10832436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of meta-analysis for the validation of surrogate endpoints and biomarkers in cancer trials.
    Buyse M
    Cancer J; 2009; 15(5):421-5. PubMed ID: 19826362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the Prentice criterion validate surrogate endpoints?
    Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1571-8. PubMed ID: 15122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Surrogate endpoints].
    Hill C
    Bull Cancer; 1999; 86(7-8):622-4. PubMed ID: 10477379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the decision in a validation process of a surrogate endpoint change with level of significance of treatment effect? A proposal on validation of surrogate endpoints.
    Sertdemir Y; Burgut R
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Jan; 30(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 18809512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endpoints and surrogate endpoints in colorectal cancer: a review of recent developments.
    Piedbois P; Buyse M
    Curr Opin Oncol; 2008 Jul; 20(4):466-71. PubMed ID: 18525345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simple meta-analytic approach for using a binary surrogate endpoint to predict the effect of intervention on true endpoint.
    Baker SG
    Biostatistics; 2006 Jan; 7(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 15972889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease: not yet surrogate endpoints.
    Coley N; Andrieu S; Delrieu J; Voisin T; Vellas B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Oct; 1180():119-24. PubMed ID: 19906266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two simple approaches for validating a binary surrogate endpoint using data from multiple trials.
    Baker SG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):505-14. PubMed ID: 18285436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endpoints for assessing drug activity in clinical trials.
    Pazdur R
    Oncologist; 2008; 13 Suppl 2():19-21. PubMed ID: 18434634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Llovet JM; Di Bisceglie AM; Bruix J; Kramer BS; Lencioni R; Zhu AX; Sherman M; Schwartz M; Lotze M; Talwalkar J; Gores GJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):698-711. PubMed ID: 18477802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a clinician's perspective.
    Piedbois P; Miller Croswell J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):519-27. PubMed ID: 18285441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protocol of the Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials (DATECAN) project: formal consensus method for the development of guidelines for standardised time-to-event endpoints' definitions in cancer clinical trials.
    Bellera CA; Pulido M; Gourgou S; Collette L; Doussau A; Kramar A; Dabakuyo TS; Ouali M; Auperin A; Filleron T; Fortpied C; Le Tourneau C; Paoletti X; Mauer M; Mathoulin-PĂ©lissier S; Bonnetain F
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Mar; 49(4):769-81. PubMed ID: 23122780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternate endpoints for screening phase II studies.
    Dhani N; Tu D; Sargent DJ; Seymour L; Moore MJ
    Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Mar; 15(6):1873-82. PubMed ID: 19276273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Validation of surrogate endpoints in digestive oncology].
    Methy N; Bedenne L; Bonnetain F
    Bull Cancer; 2009 May; 96(5):591-5. PubMed ID: 19423485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potential surrogate endpoints in cancer research--some considerations and examples.
    Duffy SW; Treasure FP
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 20029937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practical issues arising in an exploratory analysis evaluating progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer.
    Hughes MD
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 18285440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of progression-free survival as a surrogate marker in oncology trials: some regulatory issues.
    Chakravarty A; Sridhara R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):515-8. PubMed ID: 18285437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: focus on clinical trials in cardiovascular diseases.
    Lonn E
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2001; 10(6):497-508. PubMed ID: 11828831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.