97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10832523)
41. Oncological quality and preliminary long-term results in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Scheidbach H; Schneider C; Hügel O; Scheuerlein H; Bärlehner E; Konradt J; Wittekind C; Köckerling F;
Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):903-10. PubMed ID: 12632133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Does laparoscopic colonic carcinoma surgery satisfy the radicality criteria of open surgery?].
Buchmann P; Christen D; Flury R; Lüthy A; Bischofberger U
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1995 Sep; 125(39):1825-9. PubMed ID: 7481640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans.
Whelan RL; Franklin M; Holubar SD; Donahue J; Fowler R; Munger C; Doorman J; Balli JE; Glass J; Gonzalez JJ; Bessler M; Xie H; Treat M
Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):972-8. PubMed ID: 12640542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer.
Hasegawa H; Kabeshima Y; Watanabe M; Yamamoto S; Kitajima M
Surg Endosc; 2003 Apr; 17(4):636-40. PubMed ID: 12574925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Lymphadenectomy in elective and urgency surgery for resective colorectal cancer.
Scabini S; Rimini E; Romairone E; Scordamaglia R; Pertile D; Ferrando V
Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 19365318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Can colorectal carcinomas be resected laparoscopically? Technically possible, long-term outcome is still uncertain].
Böhm B; Gründel K; Neudecker J; Schwenk W
MMW Fortschr Med; 2000 Feb; 142(8):30-2. PubMed ID: 10810864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Laparoscopic resection of colorectal malignancy--an oncological risk?].
Hohenberger W; Schneider C; Reymond MA; Scheidbach H; Köckerling F
Zentralbl Chir; 1997; 122(12):1127-33. PubMed ID: 9499539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Three-port laparoscopy-assisted colectomy for colorectal cancer using external traction with suspension suture.
Park JM; Suh SW; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2011 Oct; 21(5):e249-52. PubMed ID: 22002287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Lymph node harvest in single incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancy.
Rink AD; Vestweber B; Paul C; Vestweber KH
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Apr; 16(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 24325148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Prospective randomised study: robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer resection].
Jiménez Rodríguez RM; Díaz Pavón JM; de La Portilla de Juan F; Prendes Sillero E; Hisnard Cadet Dussort JM; Padillo J
Cir Esp; 2011; 89(7):432-8. PubMed ID: 21530948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Laparoscopic colon resection--is an oncological resection by laparoscopy approach possible?].
Faust H; Reichel K
Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 7610728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. A comparative study].
Arribas-Martin A; Díaz-Pizarro-Graf JI; Muñoz-Hinojosa JD; Valdés-Castañeda A; Cruz-Ramírez O; Bertrand MM
Cir Cir; 2014; 82(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 25238469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. More adequate lymph node dissection after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Verheijen PM; vd Ven AW; Davids PH; Pronk A
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Dec; 23(6):498-501. PubMed ID: 24300925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A comparative analysis between laparoscopy and open colectomy: assessment of perioperative and oncological outcomes.
Farinetti A; Bonetti LR; Migaldi M; Mattioli AV; Pennella S; Muratori S; Rossi A
Ann Ital Chir; 2015; 86(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 25819696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of mini laparotomy with conventional laparotomy as the surgical approach in stage I-III CRC patients: appealing outcomes.
Tsai HL; Chen MJ; Yeh YS; Chen CW; Sun LC; Lu CY; Yang IP; Wang JY
Hepatogastroenterology; 2012 Oct; 59(119):2132-6. PubMed ID: 22328300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Current status in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Milsom JW; Casillas S
Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 1996; 61(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 8927914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Laparoscopic colectomy is superior to laparotomy for reduction of disability in patients with colorectal adenoma.
Chen HH; Iroatulam AJ; Alabaz O; Joo JS; Weiss EG; Nogueras JJ; Wexner SD
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Dec; 22(4):586-92. PubMed ID: 10695205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Martínez JL; Rivas H; Delgado S; Castells A; Pique JM; Lacy AM
Surg Endosc; 2004 Jul; 18(7):1071-4. PubMed ID: 15156381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the geriatric patient.
Anania G; Scagliarini L; Santini M; Marzetti A; Gregorio C; Vedana L; Resta G; Cavallesco G
G Chir; 2012 Oct; 33(10):352-7. PubMed ID: 23095567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]