BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10833723)

  • 1. Auditory backward-masking performance by children who stutter and its relation to dysfluency rate.
    Howell P; Rosen S; Hannigan G; Rustin L
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Apr; 90(2):355-63. PubMed ID: 10833723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory abilities of speakers who persisted, or recovered, from stuttering.
    Howell P; Davis S; Williams SM
    J Fluency Disord; 2006; 31(4):257-70. PubMed ID: 16920188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The perception of speech naturalness of post-therapeutic and altered auditory feedback speech of adults with mild and severe stuttering.
    Stuart A; Kalinowski J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2004; 56(6):347-57. PubMed ID: 15557773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Altered auditory feedback and the treatment of stuttering: a review.
    Lincoln M; Packman A; Onslow M
    J Fluency Disord; 2006; 31(2):71-89. PubMed ID: 16750562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An experimental investigation of the effect of altered auditory feedback on the conversational speech of adults who stutter.
    Lincoln M; Packman A; Onslow M; Jones M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 53(5):1122-31. PubMed ID: 20220025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of auditory sensitivity in children who stutter and fluent children.
    Howell P; Williams SM
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 15179117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of alterations in auditory feedback and speech rate on stuttering frequency.
    Kalinowski J; Armson J; Roland-Mieszkowski M; Stuart A; Gracco VL
    Lang Speech; 1993; 36 ( Pt 1)():1-16. PubMed ID: 8345771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotional and physiological responses of fluent listeners while watching the speech of adults who stutter.
    Guntupalli VK; Everhart DE; Kalinowski J; Nanjundeswaran C; Saltuklaroglu T
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2007; 42(2):113-29. PubMed ID: 17365090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Error monitoring in people who stutter: evidence against auditory feedback defect theories.
    Postma A; Kolk H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Oct; 35(5):1024-32. PubMed ID: 1447913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Backward masking of tones and speech in people who do and do not stutter.
    Basu S; Schlauch RS; Sasisekaran J
    J Fluency Disord; 2018 Sep; 57():11-21. PubMed ID: 30064031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel tactile feedback to reduce overt stuttering.
    Waddell DE; Goggans PM; Snyder GJ
    Neuroreport; 2012 Aug; 23(12):727-30. PubMed ID: 22776903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inducement of fluent speech in persons who stutter via visual choral speech.
    Kalinowski J; Stuart A; Rastatter MP; Snyder G; Dayalu V
    Neurosci Lett; 2000 Mar; 281(2-3):198-200. PubMed ID: 10704777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of monaural and binaural altered auditory feedback on stuttering frequency.
    Stuart A; Kalinowski J; Rastatter MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3806-9. PubMed ID: 9193064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigations of the impact of altered auditory feedback in-the-ear devices on the speech of people who stutter: initial fitting and 4-month follow-up.
    Stuart A; Kalinowski J; Rastatter M; Saltuklaroglu T; Dayalu V
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2004; 39(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 14660188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of self-generated synchronous and asynchronous visual speech feedback on overt stuttering frequency.
    Snyder GJ; Hough MS; Blanchet P; Ivy LJ; Waddell D
    J Commun Disord; 2009; 42(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 19304293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of speech effort during fluency-inducing conditions in adults who do and do not stutter.
    Ingham RJ; Bothe AK; Jang E; Yates L; Cotton J; Seybold I
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 52(5):1286-301. PubMed ID: 19696436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impaired Categorical Perception of Speech Sounds Under the Backward Masking Condition in Adults Who Stutter.
    Shao J; Bakhtiar M; Zhang C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jul; 65(7):2554-2570. PubMed ID: 35858255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparisons of stuttering frequency during and after speech initiation in unaltered feedback, altered auditory feedback and choral speech conditions.
    Saltuklaroglu T; Kalinowski J; Robbins M; Crawcour S; Bowers A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(6):1000-17. PubMed ID: 19294550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate effects of AAF devices on the characteristics of stuttering: a clinical analysis.
    Unger JP; Glück CW; Cholewa J
    J Fluency Disord; 2012 Jun; 37(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 22531287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of reading with reversed speech on frequency of stuttering in adults.
    Rami MK; Diederich E
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Apr; 100(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 15974349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.