159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10833754)
1. Towers of Hanoi and London: is the nonshared variance due to differences in task administration?
Welsh MC; Revilla V; Strongin D; Kepler M
Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Apr; 90(2):562-72. PubMed ID: 10833754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between choice reaction time and the Tower of Hanoi test.
Bestawros A; Langevin JP; Lalonde R; Botez-Marquard T
Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Apr; 88(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 10483620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Towers of Hanoi and London: contribution of working memory and inhibition to performance.
Welsh MC; Satterlee-Cartmell T; Stine M
Brain Cogn; 1999 Nov; 41(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 10590821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of performance on the Towers of London and Hanoi in young children.
Bull R; Espy KA; Senn TE
J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2004 May; 45(4):743-54. PubMed ID: 15056306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the use of the wooden and computerized versions of the Tower of Hanoi puzzle equivalent?
Mataix-Cols D; Bartrés-Faz D
Appl Neuropsychol; 2002; 9(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 12214823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of procedural learning and problem solving in schizophrenic patients by Tower of Hanoi type tasks.
Goldberg TE; Saint-Cyr JA; Weinberger DR
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci; 1990; 2(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 2136071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The development and preliminary validation of the Tower of Hanoi-revised.
Welsh MC; Huizinga M
Assessment; 2001 Jun; 8(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 11428696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A deficit in optimizing task solution but robust and well-retained speed and accuracy gains in complex skill acquisition in Parkinson׳s disease: multi-session training on the Tower of Hanoi Puzzle.
Vakil E; Hassin-Baer S; Karni A
Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 57():12-9. PubMed ID: 24530238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiating Tower of Hanoi performance: interactive effects of psychopathic tendencies, impulsive response styles, and modality.
Salnaitis CL; Baker CA; Holland J; Welsh M
Appl Neuropsychol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 21390899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On testing the face validity of planning/problem-solving tasks in a normal population.
Kafer KL; Hunter M
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 1997 Mar; 3(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 9126852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Towers of Hanoi and London: Reliability and Validity of Two Executive Function Tasks.
Humes GE; Welsh MC; Retzlaff P; Cookson N
Assessment; 1997 Sep; 4(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 26613774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing planning ability with the Tower of London task: psychometric properties of a structurally balanced problem set.
Kaller CP; Unterrainer JM; Stahl C
Psychol Assess; 2012 Mar; 24(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21859218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of planning performance in clinical samples: Reliability and validity of the Tower of London task (TOL-F).
Köstering L; Schmidt CS; Egger K; Amtage F; Peter J; Klöppel S; Beume LA; Hoeren M; Weiller C; Kaller CP
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():646-55. PubMed ID: 26197091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prefrontal EEG correlation during Tower of Hanoi and WCST performance: effect of emotional visual stimuli.
Ruiz-Díaz M; Hernández-González M; Guevara MA; Amezcua C; Ågmo A
J Sex Med; 2012 Oct; 9(10):2631-40. PubMed ID: 22613069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prefrontal-parietal correlation during performance of the towers of Hanoi task in male children, adolescents and young adults.
Guevara MA; Rizo Martínez LE; Robles Aguirre FA; Hernández González M
Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Jan; 2(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 22682734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing planning and set-shifting abilities in autism: are experimenter-administered and computerised versions of tasks equivalent?
Williams D; Jarrold C
Autism Res; 2013 Dec; 6(6):461-7. PubMed ID: 23893967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Task-relevant modulation of primary somatosensory cortex suggests a prefrontal-cortical sensory gating system.
Schaefer M; Heinze HJ; Rotte M
Neuroimage; 2005 Aug; 27(1):130-5. PubMed ID: 15886021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Working memory, inhibition, and fluid intelligence as predictors of performance on Tower of Hanoi and London tasks.
Zook NA; Davalos DB; Delosh EL; Davis HP
Brain Cogn; 2004 Dec; 56(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 15522766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Individual differences in cognitive planning on the Tower of Hanoi task: neuropsychological maturity or measurement error?
Bishop DV; Aamodt-Leeper G; Creswell C; McGurk R; Skuse DH
J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2001 May; 42(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 11383971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concurrent validity of the tower tasks as measures of executive function in adults: a meta-analysis.
Sullivan JR; Riccio CA; Castillo CL
Appl Neuropsychol; 2009; 16(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 19205950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
