209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10833822)
1. Tests may replace Pap smears.
AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2000 May; 14(5):286. PubMed ID: 10833822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abnormal Pap smears, ASCUS still ob/gyn puzzle.
Titus K
JAMA; 1996 Oct; 276(13):1014-6. PubMed ID: 8847749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Bethesda system and Pap smear screening.
Miller K
Am Fam Physician; 1995 Feb; 51(2):331-2. PubMed ID: 7840027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Self-sampling at home can prevent cervix cancer].
Sanner K; Wikström I; Lindell M; Strand A; Wilander E
Lakartidningen; 2009 Nov 11-17; 106(46):3075-7. PubMed ID: 19998610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Female genital tract.
Tambouret R
Cancer Treat Res; 2014; 160():241-72. PubMed ID: 24092373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Recommendations in aberrant findings of cytological studies of the cervix uteri].
Vooijs GP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1987 Sep; 131(38):1662-3. PubMed ID: 3670461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Management of abnormal cervical smears: management of ASCUS cervical smears].
Benmoura D; Cravello L; Roger V; Blanc B
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1999 Mar; 27(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 10334068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Overview of the cytology laboratory: specimen processing through diagnosis.
Joste N
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):549-63; viii. PubMed ID: 19061816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [HPV test makes cytological examination more accurate. Cervical cancer can be discovered more efficiently].
Andersson S; Hjerpe A; Johansson BC; Hagmar B
Lakartidningen; 2007 Sep 26-Oct 2; 104(39):2797-9. PubMed ID: 17958005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolution in cervical pathology and cytology: a historical perspective.
Koss LG
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000; 21(6):550-4. PubMed ID: 11214608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Trial quickly changed management of cervical abnormalities.
Zielinski SL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Apr; 97(7):479-80. PubMed ID: 15812071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Analysis of PAP III D findings as a discussion principle for clinical consequences].
Ortner A
Gynakol Rundsch; 1989; 29 Suppl 2():103-5. PubMed ID: 2558987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [How to read a PAP report?].
Nieminen P
Duodecim; 1998; 114(11):1138-43. PubMed ID: 11544696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of two simultaneously obtained cervical cytological smears.
Sedlis A; Walters AT; Balin H; Hontz A; Lo Sciuto L
Acta Cytol; 1974; 18(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 4526248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Significance of sources of error and quality control in cytologic mass screening].
Zimmer S; Krahnert U; Munck C
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1987; 109(4):209-17. PubMed ID: 3591056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Experience with new technologies within the context of Swiss practice and conclusions].
Weintraub J
Ann Pathol; 1999; 19(5 Suppl):S96-8. PubMed ID: 10599466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of monolayer specimens and conventional smears].
Jensen ML; Fuursted PB; Svanholm H
Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Feb; 163(9):1270-5. PubMed ID: 11258251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Screening for cervix cancer--where are we going?].
Kjaer SK
Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 May; 162(21):3015. PubMed ID: 10850187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cervical cancer screening: restoration or reconstruction?].
Riethmuller D
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009; 37(7-8):671-9. PubMed ID: 19577501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Epidemiology of HPV infection].
Boulanger JC; Sevestre H; Bauville E; Ghighi C; Harlicot JP; Gondry J
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Mar; 32(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 15123119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
