These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10834352)

  • 1. The validity of power output recorded during exercise performance tests using a Kingcycle air-braked cycle ergometer when compared with an SRM powermeter.
    Balmer J; Davison RC; Coleman DA; Bird SR
    Int J Sports Med; 2000 Apr; 21(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 10834352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity and reliability of the Axiom PowerTrain cycle ergometer when compared with an SRM powermeter.
    Bertucci W; Duc S; Villerius V; Grappe F
    Int J Sports Med; 2005; 26(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 15643536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ergometer error and biological variation in power output in a performance test with three cycle ergometers.
    Paton CD; Hopkins WG
    Int J Sports Med; 2006 Jun; 27(6):444-7. PubMed ID: 16767608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of mean power recorded during indoor and outdoor self-paced 40 km cycling time-trials.
    Smith MF; Davison RC; Balmer J; Bird SR
    Int J Sports Med; 2001 May; 22(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 11414669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the reproducibility of performance testing on an air-braked cycle ergometer.
    Palmer GS; Dennis SC; Noakes TD; Hawley JA
    Int J Sports Med; 1996 May; 17(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 8814512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of age on 16.1-km time-trial performance.
    Balmer J; Bird S; Davison R; Lucia A
    J Sports Sci; 2008 Jan; 26(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 17924277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reliability of the Ergomopro powermeter.
    Kirkland A; Coleman D; Wiles JD; Hopker J
    Int J Sports Med; 2008 Nov; 29(11):913-6. PubMed ID: 18512176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity and reliability of the Polar S710 mobile cycling powermeter.
    Millet GP; Tronche C; Fuster N; Bentley DJ; Candau R
    Int J Sports Med; 2003 Apr; 24(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 12740731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of a combined 3-min constant load and performance cycling test.
    Doherty M; Balmer J; Davison RC; Robinson L; Smith PM
    Int J Sports Med; 2003 Jul; 24(5):366-71. PubMed ID: 12868049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of an air-braked ergometer to record peak power during a maximal cycling test.
    Balmer J; Davison RC; Bird SR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Oct; 32(10):1790-3. PubMed ID: 11039654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and reliability of the Wattbike cycle ergometer.
    Hopker J; Myers S; Jobson SA; Bruce W; Passfield L
    Int J Sports Med; 2010 Oct; 31(10):731-6. PubMed ID: 20665423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of sprint test indices in well-trained cyclists.
    Coleman DA; Wiles JD; Nunn M; Smith MF
    Int J Sports Med; 2005 Jun; 26(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 15895322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Indoor 16.1-km time-trial performance in cyclists aged 25- 63 years.
    Balmer J; Bird S; Davison R
    J Sports Sci; 2008 Jan; 26(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17852672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of differing pedalling speeds on the power-duration relationship of high intensity cycle ergometry.
    McNaughton L; Thomas D
    Int J Sports Med; 1996 May; 17(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 8814511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and reliability of the PowerTap mobile cycling powermeter when compared with the SRM Device.
    Bertucci W; Duc S; Villerius V; Pernin JN; Grappe F
    Int J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 26(10):868-73. PubMed ID: 16320172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carbohydrate ingestion immediately before exercise does not improve 20 km time trial performance in well trained cyclists.
    Palmer GS; Clancy MC; Hawley JA; Rodger IM; Burke LM; Noakes TD
    Int J Sports Med; 1998 Aug; 19(6):415-8. PubMed ID: 9774209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of body position when considering the ecological validity of laboratory time-trial cycling performance.
    Jobson SA; Nevill AM; George SR; Jeukendrup AE; Passfield L
    J Sports Sci; 2008 Oct; 26(12):1269-78. PubMed ID: 18803064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Agreement between polar and SRM mobile ergometer systems during laboratory-based high-intensity, intermittent cycling activity.
    Hurst HT; Atkins S
    J Sports Sci; 2006 Aug; 24(8):863-8. PubMed ID: 16815781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EMG activity does not change during a time trial in competitive cyclists.
    Duc S; Betik AC; Grappe F
    Int J Sports Med; 2005 Mar; 26(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 15726491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of the rotor pedalling system on the performance of trained cyclists during incremental and constant-load cycle-ergometer tests.
    Lucía A; Balmer J; Davison RC; Pérez M; Santalla A; Smith PM
    Int J Sports Med; 2004 Oct; 25(7):479-85. PubMed ID: 15459827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.