BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10834832)

  • 1. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech production.
    Most T; Tobin Y; Mimran RC
    J Commun Disord; 2000; 33(2):165-80; quiz 180-1. PubMed ID: 10834832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic analyses clarify voiced-voiceless distinction in tracheoesophageal speech.
    Saito M; Kinishi M; Amatsu M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Sep; 120(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 11099157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spectral, cepstral, and multivariate exploration of tracheoesophageal voice quality in continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Dick C; Vandenbruaene C; Vauterin T; Jacobs T
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Dec; 119(12):2384-94. PubMed ID: 19718753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Gomyo Y; Doyle PC
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The pharyngoesophageal segment in laryngectomees--videoradiographic, acoustic, and voice quality perceptual data.
    Lundström E; Hammarberg B; Munck-Wikland E; Edsborg N
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2008; 33(3):115-25. PubMed ID: 18608876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the speech acceptability of good and excellent esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Trudeau MD
    J Commun Disord; 1987 Feb; 20(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 3819002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An acoustic analysis of excellent female esophageal, tracheoesophageal, and laryngeal speakers.
    Bellandese MH; Lerman JW; Gilbert HR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 44(6):1315-20. PubMed ID: 11776367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of speaker gender on listener judgments of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC; Hansen K; Beaudin PG
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 17055223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory-perceptual scaling and quality of life in tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Apr; 114(4):753-9. PubMed ID: 15064636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voice onset time characteristics of esophageal, tracheoesophageal, and laryngeal speech of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Wong J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 52(3):780-9. PubMed ID: 18978210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oral pressures, vowel durations, and acceptability ratings of esophageal speakers.
    Swisher WE
    J Commun Disord; 1980 May; 13(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 7381038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic Analysis of Taiwanese Tones in Esophageal Speech and Pneumatic Artificial Laryngeal Speech.
    Hong SW; Chan RW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1215-1227. PubMed ID: 35226568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of naturalness and severity in tracheoesophageal (TE) speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1088-96. PubMed ID: 12546479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic characteristics: tracheoesophageal speech.
    Baggs TW; Pine SJ
    J Commun Disord; 1983 Jul; 16(4):299-307. PubMed ID: 6571180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic characteristics of Mandarin esophageal speech.
    Liu H; Wan M; Wang S; Wang X; Lu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1016-25. PubMed ID: 16158657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
    Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech, with an emphasis on the voiced-voiceless distinction.
    Jongmans P; Hilgers FJ; Pols LC; van As-Brooks CJ
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):172-81. PubMed ID: 17114130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual and acoustical analysis of alaryngeal speech: determinants of intelligibility.
    Drummond S; Dancer J; Krueger K; Spring G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):801-2. PubMed ID: 8961316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production.
    Robbins J; Fisher HB; Blom EC; Singer MI
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 May; 49(2):202-10. PubMed ID: 6716991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pitch control in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech of Cantonese.
    Yan N; Lam PK; Ng ML
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(5):241-7. PubMed ID: 23051971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.