These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10834832)

  • 1. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech production.
    Most T; Tobin Y; Mimran RC
    J Commun Disord; 2000; 33(2):165-80; quiz 180-1. PubMed ID: 10834832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic analyses clarify voiced-voiceless distinction in tracheoesophageal speech.
    Saito M; Kinishi M; Amatsu M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Sep; 120(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 11099157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spectral, cepstral, and multivariate exploration of tracheoesophageal voice quality in continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Dick C; Vandenbruaene C; Vauterin T; Jacobs T
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Dec; 119(12):2384-94. PubMed ID: 19718753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Gomyo Y; Doyle PC
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The pharyngoesophageal segment in laryngectomees--videoradiographic, acoustic, and voice quality perceptual data.
    Lundström E; Hammarberg B; Munck-Wikland E; Edsborg N
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2008; 33(3):115-25. PubMed ID: 18608876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the speech acceptability of good and excellent esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Trudeau MD
    J Commun Disord; 1987 Feb; 20(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 3819002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An acoustic analysis of excellent female esophageal, tracheoesophageal, and laryngeal speakers.
    Bellandese MH; Lerman JW; Gilbert HR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 44(6):1315-20. PubMed ID: 11776367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of speaker gender on listener judgments of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC; Hansen K; Beaudin PG
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 17055223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory-perceptual scaling and quality of life in tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Apr; 114(4):753-9. PubMed ID: 15064636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voice onset time characteristics of esophageal, tracheoesophageal, and laryngeal speech of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Wong J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 52(3):780-9. PubMed ID: 18978210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oral pressures, vowel durations, and acceptability ratings of esophageal speakers.
    Swisher WE
    J Commun Disord; 1980 May; 13(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 7381038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic Analysis of Taiwanese Tones in Esophageal Speech and Pneumatic Artificial Laryngeal Speech.
    Hong SW; Chan RW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1215-1227. PubMed ID: 35226568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of naturalness and severity in tracheoesophageal (TE) speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1088-96. PubMed ID: 12546479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic characteristics: tracheoesophageal speech.
    Baggs TW; Pine SJ
    J Commun Disord; 1983 Jul; 16(4):299-307. PubMed ID: 6571180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic characteristics of Mandarin esophageal speech.
    Liu H; Wan M; Wang S; Wang X; Lu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1016-25. PubMed ID: 16158657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
    Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech, with an emphasis on the voiced-voiceless distinction.
    Jongmans P; Hilgers FJ; Pols LC; van As-Brooks CJ
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):172-81. PubMed ID: 17114130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual and acoustical analysis of alaryngeal speech: determinants of intelligibility.
    Drummond S; Dancer J; Krueger K; Spring G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):801-2. PubMed ID: 8961316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production.
    Robbins J; Fisher HB; Blom EC; Singer MI
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 May; 49(2):202-10. PubMed ID: 6716991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pitch control in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech of Cantonese.
    Yan N; Lam PK; Ng ML
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(5):241-7. PubMed ID: 23051971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.