These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10835611)

  • 1. Patents on genes: clarifying the issues.
    Crespi RS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jun; 18(6):683-4. PubMed ID: 10835611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lords panel backs ethical barriers to biotech patents.
    Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6469):278. PubMed ID: 8127355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. European patents. Tough stance on stem cell, DNA claims.
    Vogel G
    Science; 2002 Aug; 297(5582):754-5. PubMed ID: 12161624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patents on parts of the human body: salient issues under EC and WTO law.
    Herdegen M
    J World Intellect Prop; 2002 Mar; 5(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 15986546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patentable subject matter, TRIPS and the European Biotechnology Directive: Australia and patenting human genes.
    Palombi L
    Univ N S W Law J; 2003; 26(3):782-92. PubMed ID: 16617532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Procedure for gene patents.
    Blecher M
    Nature; 1993 Jan; 361(6409):199. PubMed ID: 8423844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biotechnology patents: strategies for meeting economic and ethical concerns.
    Gold ER
    Nat Genet; 2002 Apr; 30(4):359. PubMed ID: 11925560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How many lawyers does it take...greed and legal wrangling could stifle the medical revolution.
    New Sci; 2002 May; 174(2343):3. PubMed ID: 12731531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biotechnology. Lawsuit challenges legal basis for patenting human genes.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2009 May; 324(5930):1000-1. PubMed ID: 19460975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomics companies welcome US PTO initiative on DNA patents.
    Marshall A
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Feb; 15(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 9035129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Europe's patent rebellion.
    Wadman M
    Fortune; 2001 Oct; 144(6):44. PubMed ID: 11586878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostics firms face new patent claim worries.
    Allison M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Jul; 27(7):586-7. PubMed ID: 19587651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patenting DNA: just when you thought it was safe.
    Chahine KG
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jun; 15(6):586-8. PubMed ID: 9181584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Much ado about gene patents: the role of foreseeability.
    Gulliford MJ
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2004; 34(2):711-45. PubMed ID: 15115032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Churches say no to gene patenting.
    Christ Century; 2000 Sep; 117(25):899-900. PubMed ID: 12528735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DNA-based patents: an empirical analysis.
    Mills AE; Tereskerz P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):993-5. PubMed ID: 18779808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. To patent or not to patent: the European Union's new biotech directive.
    Nenow L
    Houst J Int Law; 2001; 23(3):569-607. PubMed ID: 12769115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Diffuse rules on patent protection of genes. Scientists risk retroactive payment requirements].
    Orn P
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Nov; 97(46):5285-6. PubMed ID: 11116864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human genome 10th anniversary. The Human Genome (patent) Project.
    Kean S
    Science; 2011 Feb; 331(6017):530-1. PubMed ID: 21292952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patents stalemate on biotechnology.
    Butler D
    Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):393. PubMed ID: 7984224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.