These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10835611)

  • 21. The gene patenting controversy: a convergence of law, economic interests, and ethics.
    Kevles DJ; Berkowitz A
    Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):233-48. PubMed ID: 12645549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Super-enzyme patents get their day in court.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):767. PubMed ID: 12397315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Shortened life spans of biotech pioneer patents in Japan: a lesson from the DNA chip.
    Aida T; Konishi A; Hagiwara M; Hashimoto K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 May; 25(5):533-5. PubMed ID: 17483834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A modest proposal to amend the Patent Code 35 U.S.C. Section 287(c) to allow health care providers to examine their patients' DNA.
    Minwalla S
    South Ill Univ Law J; 2002; 26(3):471-504. PubMed ID: 16485364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genetic patents: gatekeeper to the promised cures.
    Westin LP
    Thomas Jefferson Law Rev; 2002; 25(1):271-99. PubMed ID: 15164741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Equivalents in biotechnology patents.
    Auer HE
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 12610574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patenting genes: is it necessary and is it evil?
    Harris RF
    Curr Biol; 2000 Mar; 10(5):R174-5. PubMed ID: 10766515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ethical aspects of biotechnology applications.
    Siegler M
    Forum (Genova); 1999; 9(3 Suppl 3):106-12. PubMed ID: 10607855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patenting the parts.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Aug; 25(8):822. PubMed ID: 17687343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patent first, ask questions later: morality and biotechnology in patent law.
    Bagley MA
    William Mary Law Rev; 2003 Dec; 45(2):469-547. PubMed ID: 15570677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dr. Moreau has left the island: dealing with human-animal patents in the 21st century.
    Jagels M
    Thomas Jefferson Law Rev; 2000; 23(1):115-47. PubMed ID: 15080119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. German stance on gene patenting at odds with the rest of Europe?
    Senior K
    Drug Discov Today; 2005 Feb; 10(4):231. PubMed ID: 15708738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. US jury split over hormone patent case..
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Jun; 399(6736):512. PubMed ID: 10376586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intellectual property. NIH roils academe with advice on licensing DNA patents.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5665):1757-8. PubMed ID: 15031474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genetics. Trends in human gene patent litigation.
    Holman CM
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):198-9. PubMed ID: 18845733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patent border wars: defining the boundary between scientific discoveries and patentable inventions.
    Holman CM
    Trends Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 25(12):539-43. PubMed ID: 17983675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biotech patents and the inequitable conduct doctrine.
    Michael A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Oct; 24(10):1219-21. PubMed ID: 17033655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Who deserves the patent pot of gold?: an inquiry into the proper inventorship of patient-based discoveries.
    Ho CM
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2004; 7(2):185-243. PubMed ID: 15675072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biotech in post-TRIPS India.
    Ramani SV; Pradhan P; Ravi M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 15637608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. US court case to define EST patentability.
    Lawrence S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 May; 23(5):513. PubMed ID: 15877055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.