BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10836244)

  • 1. The hospital volume-outcome relationship in general thoracic surgery. Is the surgeon the critical determinant?
    Urschel JD; Urschel DM
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2000 Feb; 41(1):153-5. PubMed ID: 10836244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of surgeon demographics and technique on outcomes after esophageal resections: a nationwide study.
    Gopaldas RR; Bhamidipati CM; Dao TK; Markley JG
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Mar; 95(3):1064-9. PubMed ID: 23261119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial clinical outcomes after completion of training in a Canadian Royal College thoracic surgery program.
    Milman S; Ng T
    Can J Surg; 2006 Dec; 49(6):422-6. PubMed ID: 17234072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Useful benchmarks to evaluate outcomes after esophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Traverso LW; Shinchi H; Low DE
    Am J Surg; 2004 May; 187(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 15135674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of surgeon specialty on outcomes in general thoracic surgery: a national sample 1996 to 2005.
    Schipper PH; Diggs BS; Ungerleider RM; Welke KF
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Nov; 88(5):1566-72; discussion 1572-3. PubMed ID: 19853114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hip fracture outcomes: does surgeon or hospital volume really matter?
    Browne JA; Pietrobon R; Olson SA
    J Trauma; 2009 Mar; 66(3):809-14. PubMed ID: 19276758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation.
    Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY; McCarter MD; Phillips JD; DeCamp MM; Sherman KL; Ko CY; Bentrem DJ
    Arch Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(11):1009-16. PubMed ID: 23165615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on the 30-day mortality of lung cancer surgery: A nation-based reappraisal.
    Falcoz PE; Puyraveau M; Rivera C; Bernard A; Massard G; Mauny F; Dahan M; Thomas PA;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Sep; 148(3):841-8; discussion 848. PubMed ID: 24534677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience.
    Schmidt CM; Turrini O; Parikh P; House MG; Zyromski NJ; Nakeeb A; Howard TJ; Pitt HA; Lillemoe KD
    Arch Surg; 2010 Jul; 145(7):634-40. PubMed ID: 20644125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Goshima KR; Mills JL; Awari K; Pike SL; Hughes JD
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2008; 22(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 18411029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Esophagectomy for cancer: clinical concerns support centralizing operations within the larger hospitals.
    Fujita H; Ozawa S; Kuwano H; Ueda Y; Hattori S; Yanagawa T;
    Dis Esophagus; 2010 Feb; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 19515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgeon Volume and Cancer Esophagectomy, Gastrectomy, and Pancreatectomy: A Population-based Study in England.
    Mamidanna R; Ni Z; Anderson O; Spiegelhalter SD; Bottle A; Aylin P; Faiz O; Hanna GB
    Ann Surg; 2016 Apr; 263(4):727-32. PubMed ID: 26501701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Operative outcomes in mitral valve surgery: combined effect of surgeon and hospital volume in a population-based analysis.
    Kilic A; Shah AS; Conte JV; Baumgartner WA; Yuh DD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 146(3):638-46. PubMed ID: 22914251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should esophagectomy be performed in a low-volume center?
    Padmanabhan RS; Byrnes MC; Helmer SD; Smith RS
    Am Surg; 2002 Apr; 68(4):348-51; discussion 351-2. PubMed ID: 11952245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A surgeon's case volume of oesophagectomy for cancer does not influence patient outcome in a high volume hospital.
    Jeganathan R; Kinnear H; Campbell J; Jordan S; Graham A; Gavin A; McManus K; McGuigan J
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 9(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 19359284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.
    Begg CB; Cramer LD; Hoskins WJ; Brennan MF
    JAMA; 1998 Nov; 280(20):1747-51. PubMed ID: 9842949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical modeling of the volume-outcome effect for carotid endarterectomy for 10 years of a statewide database.
    Nazarian SM; Yenokyan G; Thompson RE; Griswold ME; Chang DC; Perler BA
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 48(2):343-50; discussion 50. PubMed ID: 18644481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The "occasional open heart surgeon" revisited.
    Carey JS; Parker JP; Brandeau C; Li Z
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jun; 135(6):1254-60. PubMed ID: 18544365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.
    Dunn DH; Johnson EM; Morphew JA; Dilworth HP; Krueger JL; Banerji N
    Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 22394116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality, not volume, determines outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery in a university-based community hospital network.
    Kurlansky PA; Argenziano M; Dunton R; Lancey R; Nast E; Stewart A; Williams T; Zapolanski A; Chang H; Tingley J; Smith CR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Feb; 143(2):287-93. PubMed ID: 22104669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.