These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10837227)
1. Simulated self-motion alters perceived time to collision. Gray R; Regan D Curr Biol; 2000 May; 10(10):587-90. PubMed ID: 10837227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long range interactions between object-motion and self-motion in the perception of movement in depth. Gray R; Macuga K; Regan D Vision Res; 2004 Jan; 44(2):179-95. PubMed ID: 14637367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual processing of the impending collision of a looming object: time to collision revisited. Yan JJ; Lorv B; Li H; Sun HJ J Vis; 2011 Oct; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 22003252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Binocular processing of motion: some unresolved questions. Regan D; Gray R Spat Vis; 2009; 22(1):1-43. PubMed ID: 19055886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Gray R; Regan D Vision Res; 1998 Feb; 38(4):499-512. PubMed ID: 9536374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Binocular information about time to collision and time to passage. Regan D Vision Res; 2002 Oct; 42(22):2479-84. PubMed ID: 12445841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating the time to collision with a rotating nonspherical object. Gray R; Regan D Vision Res; 2000; 40(1):49-63. PubMed ID: 10768041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Observers cannot accurately estimate the speed of an approaching object in flight. Rushton SK; Duke PA Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(15):1919-28. PubMed ID: 19146869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Binocular vision: the neural integration of depth and motion. Freeman RD Curr Biol; 1998 Oct; 8(21):R761-4. PubMed ID: 9799730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The dichoptiscope: an instrument for investigating cues to motion in depth. Howard IP; Fukuda K; Allison RS J Vis; 2013 Dec; 13(14):. PubMed ID: 24297775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D flash lag illusion. Ishii M; Seekkuarachchi H; Tamura H; Tang Z Vision Res; 2004; 44(17):1981-4. PubMed ID: 15149831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual search for motion-in-depth: stereomotion does not 'pop out' from disparity noise. Harris JM; McKee SP; Watamaniuk SN Nat Neurosci; 1998 Jun; 1(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 10195134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of perceived motion-in-depth on time perception. Ono F; Kitazawa S Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 20089248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hitting what one wants to hit and missing what one wants to miss. Regan D; Gray R Vision Res; 2001; 41(25-26):3321-9. PubMed ID: 11718776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perception of scene-relative object movement: Optic flow parsing and the contribution of monocular depth cues. Warren PA; Rushton SK Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1406-19. PubMed ID: 19480063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of feedback in the accuracy of perceived direction of motion-in-depth and control of interceptive action. Gray R; Regan D; Castaneda B; Sieffert R Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1676-94. PubMed ID: 16169039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]