62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10838301)
1. Evaluation of the cone biopsy excisor compared with the large loop for electrosurgical excision of cervical lesions.
Fischer NR; Alexandarian D; Gagliardi S; Oglesby J; Scribner D; Asuncion C; Mesologitis T
Prim Care Update Ob Gyns; 1998 Jul; 5(4):161-162. PubMed ID: 10838301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a new instrument designed for directed cervical excision: cone biopsy excisor.
Scribner DR; Fischer NR; Gagliardi S; Alexanderian D; Asuncion C; Mesologitis T; Beller P
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1998 Jan; 2(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 25951355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized trial of the Fischer cone biopsy excisor and loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Boardman LA; Steinhoff MM; Shackelton R; Weitzen S; Crowthers L
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 104(4):745-50. PubMed ID: 15458896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of cervical dysplasia with the Fischer cone biopsy excisor in a family medicine office: a case series.
Mulhem E; Kennedy EL; Lick D
J Am Board Fam Med; 2010; 23(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 20207924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Excisional treatment comparison for in situ endocervical adenocarcinoma (EXCISE): A phase 2 pilot randomized controlled trial to compare histopathological margin status, specimen size and fragmentation after loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife cone biopsy.
Cohen PA; Leung Y; Anderson L; van der Griend R; Chivers P; Bilic S; Bittinger S; Brand A; Bulsara MK; Codde J; Eva L; Farrell L; Harker D; Herbst U; Jeffares S; Loh D; McNally O; Mohan GR; Nicholson T; Powell A; Salfinger SG; Simcock B; Stewart C; Silvers J; Stockler MR; Sykes P; Stoyles P; Tan A; Tan AL; Wrede CDH
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):623-629. PubMed ID: 33032824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Specimen Fragmentation and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cold Knife Cone Biopsy Outcomes.
Grubman J; Meinhardt SS; Nambiar A; Lea JS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jan; 24(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 31860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A pilot study comparing efficacy of a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Excisor with loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Sanu O; Pal A; George S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Jul; 151(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 20303641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure as compared to cold-knife cone biopsy in patients with unsatisfactory colposcopy.
Faught W; Prévost MR; Fung MF; Senterman M
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1999 Apr; 3(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 25950558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Monopolar Electrosurgical Conization and the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in the Management of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion.
Ding J; Xu H; Xia L; Cao S; Wu Q
Front Surg; 2021; 8():721545. PubMed ID: 34616768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Positive endocervical margins at conization: repeat conization or colposcopic follow-up? A retrospective study.
Chambo Filho A; Garbeloto E; Guarconi JR; Partele MP
J Clin Med Res; 2015 Jul; 7(7):540-4. PubMed ID: 26015819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bipolar electrosurgical loop excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Dunton CJ; Brill KR; van Hoeven K
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1999 Jan; 3(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25950294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of a Pattern-based Classification System for Invasive Endocervical Adenocarcinoma in Cervical Biopsy, Cone and Loop Electrosurgical Excision (LEEP) Material: Pattern on Cone and LEEP is Predictive of Pattern in the Overall Tumor.
Djordjevic B; Parra-Herran C
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2016 Sep; 35(5):456-66. PubMed ID: 26630232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk Factor Analysis of Persistent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Conization.
Chen L; Liu L; Tao X; Guo L; Zhang H; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Jan; 23(1):24-27. PubMed ID: 30371553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Loop electrosurgical excision procedures for cervical dysplasia: experience in a community hospital.
Krebs HB; Pastore L; Helmkamp BF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 169(2 Pt 1):289-93; discussion 293-5. PubMed ID: 8362938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating cervical neoplasia. LEEP as an alternative to cold knife conization.
Simmons JR; Anderson L; Hernandez E; Heller PB
J Reprod Med; 1998 Dec; 43(12):1007-13. PubMed ID: 9883402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recurrence of dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedures with long-term follow-up.
Gonzalez DI; Zahn CM; Retzloff MG; Moore WF; Kost ER; Snyder RR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Feb; 184(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 11228480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of concordance between loop electrosurgical excisional procedure and cervical colposcopic biopsy results.
İnal HA; Han O; Öztürk İnal Z; Eren Karanis Mİ; Küçükosmanoğlu İ
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2024 Mar; 25(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 38054754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construction and Evaluation of a Clinical Prediction Scoring System for Positive Cervical Margins Under Colposcopy.
Zhu M; Yu M; Chen Z; Zhao W
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():807849. PubMed ID: 35295609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pregnancy outcome after electrosurgical cervical cone biopsy using Fischer cone biopsy excisor.
Anwar A; Igbenehi C; Lindow SW; Noor N; Musa S; Saha A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(3):477-81. PubMed ID: 25747954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
