These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10838805)

  • 21. Comparison of inter- and intra-chromosomal aberrations in blood samples exposed to different dose rates of gamma radiation.
    Karthikeya-Prabhu B; Venkatachalam P; Paul SF; Muthuvelu K; Balu-David M; Mohankumar MN; Jeevanram RK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 103(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 12593428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Chromosomal analysis to assess radiation dose.
    Lloyd DC
    Stem Cells; 1997; 15 Suppl 2():195-201. PubMed ID: 9368304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of X-ray dose-response curves obtained by chromosome painting using conventional and PAINT nomenclatures.
    Barquinero JF; Cigarrán S; Caballín MR; Braselmann H; Ribas M; Egozcue J; Barrios L
    Int J Radiat Biol; 1999 Dec; 75(12):1557-66. PubMed ID: 10622262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bayesian methods for chromosome dosimetry following a criticality accident.
    Brame RS; Groer PG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 12862245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cytogenetic investigation of occupationally irradiated persons a long time after exposure.
    Kharchenko T; Slozina N; Neronova E; Nikiforov A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2000 May; 52(5):1161-4. PubMed ID: 10836423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Easy biodosimetry for high-dose radiation exposures using drug-induced, prematurely condensed chromosomes.
    Kanda R; Hayata I; Lloyd DC
    Int J Radiat Biol; 1999 Apr; 75(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 10331849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Suitability of FISH painting techniques for the detection of partial-body irradiations for biological dosimetry.
    Duran A; Barquinero JF; Caballín MR; Ribas M; Puig P; Egozcue J; Barrios L
    Radiat Res; 2002 Apr; 157(4):461-8. PubMed ID: 11893249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods.
    Léonard A; Rueff J; Gerber GB; Léonard ED
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimization and validation of automated dicentric chromosome analysis for radiological/nuclear triage applications.
    Ryan TL; Escalona MB; Smith TL; Albanese J; Iddins CJ; Balajee AS
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2019 Nov; 847():503087. PubMed ID: 31699339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Unstable chromosome aberrations in lymphocytes of liquidators of the Chernobyl accident consequences].
    Svirnovskiĭ AI; Ivanov EP; Danilov IP; Bakun AV; Ageĭchik VM; Ivanov VE
    Ter Arkh; 1998; 70(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 9532656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantification of low-level radiation exposure by conventional chromosome aberration analysis.
    Bauchinger M
    Mutat Res; 1995 Oct; 339(3):177-89. PubMed ID: 7491126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distribution of radiation-induced exchange aberrations in human chromosomes 1, 2 and 4.
    Luomahaara S; Lindholm C; Mustonen R; Salomaa S
    Int J Radiat Biol; 1999 Dec; 75(12):1551-6. PubMed ID: 10622261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Complex cytogenetic characteristic of people suffered from Chernobyl accident].
    Vorobtsova IE; Semenov AV
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2006; 46(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 16756111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of colcemid concentration on chromosome aberration analysis in human lymphocytes.
    Kanda R; Jiang T; Hayata I; Kobayashi S
    J Radiat Res; 1994 Mar; 35(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 8057270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The significance of cytogenetic investigation for the estimation of Chernobyl accident consequences].
    Shevchenko VA; Snigireva GP
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2006; 46(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 16756110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A modified system for analyzing ionizing radiation-induced chromosome abnormalities.
    Shi L; Fujioka K; Sun J; Kinomura A; Inaba T; Ikura T; Ohtaki M; Yoshida M; Kodama Y; Livingston GK; Kamiya K; Tashiro S
    Radiat Res; 2012 May; 177(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 22509803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biodosimetry for high dose accidental exposures by drug induced premature chromosome condensation (PCC) assay.
    Balakrishnan S; Shirsath K; Bhat N; Anjaria K
    Mutat Res; 2010 Jun; 699(1-2):11-6. PubMed ID: 20338261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lessons from the accident with
    Sakamoto-Hojo ET
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2018 Dec; 836(Pt A):72-77. PubMed ID: 30389165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of chromosome aberrations by FISH and Giemsa assays in lymphocytes of cancer patients undergoing whole-body irradiation: comparison of in vivo and in vitro irradiation.
    Vorobtsova I; Darroudi F; Semyonov A; Kanayeva A; Timofeyeva N; Yakovleva T; Zharinov G; Natarajan AT
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2001 Nov; 77(11):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11683983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Health impacts of large releases of radionuclides. Cytogenetic effects as quantitative indicators of radiation exposure.
    Bauchinger M
    Ciba Found Symp; 1997; 203():188-99; discussion 199-204, 232-4. PubMed ID: 9339319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.