These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10840886)

  • 1. Intersibling agreement for Goldberg's big five adjective markers.
    Lanthier RP
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Apr; 86(2):400-6. PubMed ID: 10840886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Personality traits and sibling relationships in emerging adults.
    Lanthier RP
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Apr; 100(2):672-4. PubMed ID: 17564243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample.
    DeYoung CG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Dec; 91(6):1138-51. PubMed ID: 17144770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective prediction of college adjustment using self- and informant-rated personality traits.
    Kurtz JE; Puher MA; Cross NA
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 22489598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The nature and structure of correlations among Big Five ratings: the halo-alpha-beta model.
    Anusic I; Schimmack U; Pinkus RT; Lockwood P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Dec; 97(6):1142-56. PubMed ID: 19968424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asymmetry in judgments of personality: others are less differentiated than the self.
    Beer A; Watson D
    J Pers; 2008 Jun; 76(3):535-60. PubMed ID: 18399954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient-informant agreement on personality ratings and self-awareness after head injury.
    Kurtz JE; Putnam SH
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Sep; 20(3):453-68. PubMed ID: 16895858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An analysis of a cross-cultural personality inventory: the IPIP Big-Five factor markers in Croatia.
    Mlacic B; Goldberg LR
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Apr; 88(2):168-77. PubMed ID: 17437382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the big-five factor structure across samples of Chinese and American adults.
    Trull TJ; Geary DC
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Oct; 69(2):324-41. PubMed ID: 9392894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship quality, trait similarity, and self-other agreement on personality ratings in college roommates.
    Kurtz JE; Sherker JL
    J Pers; 2003 Feb; 71(1):21-48. PubMed ID: 12597236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personality judgment at zero acquaintance: agreement, assumed similarity, and implicit simplicity.
    Beer A; Watson D
    J Pers Assess; 2008 May; 90(3):250-60. PubMed ID: 18444121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personality coherence: moderating self--other profile agreement and profile consensus.
    Biesanz JC; West SG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Sep; 79(3):425-37. PubMed ID: 10981844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards understanding assessments of the big five: multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer.
    Biesanz JC; West SG
    J Pers; 2004 Aug; 72(4):845-76. PubMed ID: 15210019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self- and other-reports of traits from the five-factor model: relations to personality disorder.
    Miller JD; Pilkonis PA; Clifton A
    J Pers Disord; 2005 Aug; 19(4):400-19. PubMed ID: 16178682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers.
    Saucier G
    J Pers Assess; 1994 Dec; 63(3):506-16. PubMed ID: 7844738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metatraits of the Big Five differentially predict engagement and restraint of behavior.
    Hirsh JB; Deyoung CG; Peterson JB
    J Pers; 2009 Aug; 77(4):1085-102. PubMed ID: 19558442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationships among three general approaches to personality description.
    Mehrabian A
    J Psychol; 1995 Sep; 129(5):565-81. PubMed ID: 7473304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A meta-analysis of adult-rated child personality and academic performance in primary education.
    Poropat AE
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2014 Jun; 84(Pt 2):239-52. PubMed ID: 24829119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can children provide coherent, stable, and valid self-reports on the big five dimensions? A longitudinal study from ages 5 to 7.
    Measelle JR; John OP; Ablow JC; Cowan PA; Cowan CP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Jul; 89(1):90-106. PubMed ID: 16060748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic response consistency and protocol validity in structured personality assessment: the case of the NEO-PI-R.
    Kurtz JE; Parrish CL
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Apr; 76(2):315-32. PubMed ID: 11393463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.