133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10842045)
21. Automatic detection of the nipple in screen-film and full-field digital mammograms using a novel Hessian-based method.
Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Ancona A; Mangieri FF; Pepe ML; Rangayyan RM
J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):948-57. PubMed ID: 23508373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computer aided system for segmentation and visualization of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Reljin B; Milosević Z; Stojić T; Reljin I
Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2009 Jan; 47(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 20164042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Current status of digital mammography.
Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1996 Oct; 17(5):424-43. PubMed ID: 8896109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms.
Bick U; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Doi K
Radiographics; 1996 Nov; 16(6):1403-11. PubMed ID: 8946544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Identification of the breast boundary in mammograms using active contour models.
Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Borges RA; Frère AF
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2004 Mar; 42(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 15125150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The current status of digital mammography.
James JJ
Clin Radiol; 2004 Jan; 59(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14697370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of enhancement methods for mammograms with performance measures.
Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():486-90. PubMed ID: 25160232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Incomplete skin representation in digital mammograms.
Burgess AE; Kang H
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2834-8. PubMed ID: 15543791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of full-field digital mammography workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication system in image quality and diagnostic performance.
Kang BJ; Kim SH; Choi BG
Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 21872121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Full-field digital mammography].
Bick U
Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):957-64. PubMed ID: 11199437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Registration and difference analysis of corresponding mammogram images.
Sallam MY; Bowyer KW
Med Image Anal; 1999 Jun; 3(2):103-18. PubMed ID: 10711993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Integrated wavelets for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
Heinlein P; Drexl J; Schneider W
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Mar; 22(3):402-13. PubMed ID: 12760557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
Freer PE; Winkler N
Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography.
El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 15493691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pectoral muscle detection in mammograms based on polar coordinates and the shortest path.
Cardoso JS; Domingues I; Amaral I; Moreira I; Passarinho P; Santa Comba J; Correia R; Cardoso MJ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4781-4. PubMed ID: 21096253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mammogram registration: a phantom-based evaluation of compressed breast thickness variation effects.
Richard FJ; Bakić PR; Maidment AD
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Feb; 25(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 16468453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit.
Lu LJ; Nishino TK; Khamapirad T; Grady JJ; Leonard MH; Brunder DG
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4905-21. PubMed ID: 17671343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Automatic detection of breast border and nipple in digital mammograms.
Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Correa JL; Vidal JJ
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1996 May; 49(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 8800610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
