372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10842112)
1. Treatment effects of simple fixed appliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior crossbites.
Gu Y; Rabie AB; Hägg U
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 10842112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
Altug Z; Arslan AD
Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preliminary investigation of nonsurgical treatment of severe skeletal Class III malocclusion in the permanent dentition.
Lin J; Gu Y
Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 12940561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction.
Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):151-68. PubMed ID: 8670927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes following the use of protraction headgear for early correction of Class III malocclusion.
Chong YH; Ive JC; Artun J
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(5):351-62. PubMed ID: 8893105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.
Macdonald KE; Kapust AJ; Turley PK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10393575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dental changes and space gained as a result of early treatment of pseudo-Class III malocclusion.
Gu Y; Rabie AB
Aust Orthod J; 2000 Mar; 16(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 11201959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance.
Bendeus M; Hägg U; Rabie B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 11997762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Profile changes associated with different orthopedic treatment approaches in Class III malocclusions.
Arman A; Toygar TU; Abuhijleh E
Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):733-40. PubMed ID: 15673133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children.
Owens D; Watkinson S; Harrison JE; Turner S; Worthington HV
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 Apr; 4(4):CD003451. PubMed ID: 38597341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition.
Wieslander L
Am J Orthod; 1984 Jul; 86(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 6588755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of treatment outcome following correction of anterior crossbites in the mixed dentition: orthodontic versus orthopaedic methods.
Gu Y
Aust Orthod J; 2005 May; 21(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 16433078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible?
Strahm C; De Sousa AP; Grobéty D; Mavropoulos A; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
