These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10842736)

  • 1. Single column discrepancy and dynamic max-mini optimizations for quickly finding the most parsimonious evolutionary trees.
    Purdom PW; Bradford PG; Tamura K; Kumar S
    Bioinformatics; 2000 Feb; 16(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 10842736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Towards improving searches for optimal phylogenies.
    Ford E; St John K; Wheeler WC
    Syst Biol; 2015 Jan; 64(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 25164916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The optimization principle in phylogenetic analysis tends to give incorrect topologies when the number of nucleotides or amino acids used is small.
    Nei M; Kumar S; Takahashi K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Oct; 95(21):12390-7. PubMed ID: 9770497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hide and vanish: data sets where the most parsimonious tree is known but hard to find, and their implications for tree search methods.
    Goloboff PA
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Oct; 79():118-31. PubMed ID: 24952317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. TrExML: a maximum-likelihood approach for extensive tree-space exploration.
    Wolf MJ; Easteal S; Kahn M; McKay BD; Jermiin LS
    Bioinformatics; 2000 Apr; 16(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 10869037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
    Takahashi K; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A rapid heuristic algorithm for finding minimum evolution trees.
    Rodin A; Li WH
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Aug; 16(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 10942605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Representation in stochastic search for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
    Weber G; Ohno-Machado L; Shieber S
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Feb; 39(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 16359929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
    Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Harnessing machine learning to guide phylogenetic-tree search algorithms.
    Azouri D; Abadi S; Mansour Y; Mayrose I; Pupko T
    Nat Commun; 2021 Mar; 12(1):1983. PubMed ID: 33790270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using median sets for inferring phylogenetic trees.
    Bernt M; Merkle D; Middendorf M
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e129-35. PubMed ID: 17237080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Progressive tree neighborhood applied to the maximum parsimony problem.
    Goëffon A; Richer JM; Hao JK
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2008; 5(1):136-45. PubMed ID: 18245882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Core set approach to reduce uncertainty of gene trees.
    Okabayashi T; Kitazoe Y; Kishino H; Watabe T; Nakajima N; Okuhara Y; O'Loughlin S; Walton C
    BMC Evol Biol; 2006 May; 6():41. PubMed ID: 16712735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring inconsistency in phylogenetic trees.
    Willson SJ
    J Theor Biol; 1998 Jan; 190(1):15-36. PubMed ID: 9473388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Upper bounds on maximum likelihood for phylogenetic trees.
    Hendy MD; Holland BR
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Oct; 19 Suppl 2():ii66-72. PubMed ID: 14534174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Branch-and-bound approach for parsimonious inference of a species tree from a set of gene family trees.
    Doyon JP; Chauve C
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2011; 696():287-95. PubMed ID: 21431569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.