123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10842996)
1. [Quality control in pathology: prospective peer review on routine cases].
Greco P; Lanza C; Puzzo L; Tranchina MG; Gangemi P; Cutrona D
Pathologica; 2000 Feb; 92(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 10842996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extraneous tissue in surgical pathology: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 275 laboratories.
Gephardt GN; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Nov; 120(11):1009-14. PubMed ID: 12049100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Local audit of surgical pathology. 18 month's experience of peer review-based quality assessment in an English teaching hospital.
Ramsay AD; Gallagher PJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 1992 May; 16(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 1599026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Core components of a comprehensive quality assurance program in anatomic pathology.
Nakhleh RE
Adv Anat Pathol; 2009 Nov; 16(6):418-23. PubMed ID: 19851132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material.
Renshaw AA; Cartagena N; Granter SR; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jun; 119(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 12817425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality assurance in surgical pathology--personal and peer assessment.
Murthy MS; Derman H
Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Mar; 75(3 Suppl):462-6. PubMed ID: 7468536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Directed peer review in surgical pathology.
Smith ML; Raab SS
Adv Anat Pathol; 2012 Sep; 19(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 22885382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Periodic review of pathology training program teaching files: a quality improvement study.
Martin MA; Hallmark KC; Sharkey FE
Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Aug; 134(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 20660339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial experience with a novel pre-sign-out quality assurance tool for review of random surgical pathology diagnoses in a subspecialty-based university practice.
Owens SR; Wiehagen LT; Kelly SM; Piccoli AL; Lassige K; Yousem SA; Dhir R; Parwani AV
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1319-23. PubMed ID: 20697250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The development and testing of a laboratory information system-driven tool for pre-sign-out quality assurance of random surgical pathology reports.
Owens SR; Dhir R; Yousem SA; Kelly SM; Piccoli A; Wiehagen L; Lassige K; Parwani AV
Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):836-41. PubMed ID: 20472840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revisiting old slides--how worthwhile is it?
Agarwal S; Wadhwa N
Pathol Res Pract; 2010 Jun; 206(6):368-71. PubMed ID: 20188486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical pathology sign-out. Routine review of every case by a second pathologist.
Safrin RE; Bark CJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Nov; 17(11):1190-2. PubMed ID: 8214266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality assurance in forensic pathology.
Ong BB; Milne N
Malays J Pathol; 2009 Jun; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19694309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of workload with disagreement and amendment rates in surgical pathology and nongynecologic cytology.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 16690479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of dynamic telepathology in China.
Li X; Gong E; McNutt MA; Liu J; Li F; Li T; Anderson VM; Gu J
Hum Pathol; 2008 Feb; 39(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 17950781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring the value of review of pathology material by a second pathologist.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 May; 125(5):737-9. PubMed ID: 16707375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultation in small hospitals: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 18,532 frozen section consultation diagnoses in 233 small hospitals.
Novis DA; Gephardt GN; Zarbo RJ;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Dec; 120(12):1087-93. PubMed ID: 15456172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective peer review in surgical pathology.
Lind AC; Bewtra C; Healy JC; Sims KL
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Nov; 104(5):560-6. PubMed ID: 7572817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
