These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10843106)

  • 1. Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in mammography.
    Ng KP; Kwok CS; Tang FH
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 May; 45(5):1309-18. PubMed ID: 10843106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography using MCNP4C.
    Ay MR; Shahriari M; Sarkar S; Adib M; Zaidi H
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 49(21):4897-917. PubMed ID: 15584526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calculated mammographic spectra confirmed with attenuation curves for molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten targets.
    Blough MM; Waggener RG; Payne WH; Terry JA
    Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1605-12. PubMed ID: 9775364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of different computational models for generation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography.
    Ay MR; Sarkar S; Shahriari M; Sardari D; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1660-75. PubMed ID: 16013725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertainty estimation and statistical comparative methodology for mammography x-ray energy spectra.
    Santoro-Fernandes V; Santos JC; Mariano L; Vanin VR; Costa PR
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Apr; 6(3):035018. PubMed ID: 33438663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Dance DR; Thilander AK; Sandborg M; Skinner CL; Castellano IA; Carlsson GA
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generation and analysis of clinically relevant breast imaging x-ray spectra.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Nosratieh A; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2148-2160. PubMed ID: 28303582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of mammographic x-ray spectra generated using Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System.
    Chusin T; Matsubara K; Takemura A; Okubo R; Ogawa Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(6):065004. PubMed ID: 32187021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mean glandular dose coefficients (D(g)N) for x-ray spectra used in contemporary breast imaging systems.
    Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Shen SZ; Yaffe MJ; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(18):7179-90. PubMed ID: 26348995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography.
    Boone JM; Fewell TR; Jennings RJ
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1863-74. PubMed ID: 9434969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.
    Boone JM
    Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 10540637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets.
    Sechopoulosa I; D'Orsi CJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 9(4):161-171. PubMed ID: 19020492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measured low-energy x-ray spectra of interest in diagnostic radiology and mammography.
    Hernandez-Guzman A; Moreno-Ramírez A; Massillon-Jl G
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Oct; 67(21):. PubMed ID: 36179707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computation of beam quality parameters for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, Rh/Rh, and W/Al target/filter combinations in mammography.
    Kharrati H; Zarrad B
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2638-42. PubMed ID: 14596300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data.
    Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):869-75. PubMed ID: 12033583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of mammographic x-ray spectra: simulation with EGSnrc and experiment with CdTe detector.
    Nigapruke K; Puwanich P; Phaisangittisakul N; Youngdee W
    J Radiat Res; 2009 Nov; 50(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 19696472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimum x-ray spectra for mammography.
    Beaman SA; Lillicrap SC
    Phys Med Biol; 1982 Oct; 27(10):1209-20. PubMed ID: 7146094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Catalog of x-ray spectra of Mo-, Rh-, and W-anode-based x-ray tubes from 10 to 50 kV.
    Ketelhut S; Büermann L; Hilgers G
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 May; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33902019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short communication: kilovoltage measurement with rhodium target and filters on mammography X-ray machines.
    Underwood AC; Law J; Goodman DA; Robinson A; Rust A
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug; 69(824):769-73. PubMed ID: 8949681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of x-ray spectra and outputs from molybdenum and tungsten targets.
    Marshall M; Peaple LH; Ardran GM; Crooks HE
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Jan; 48(565):31-9. PubMed ID: 1109625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.