These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10843106)

  • 21. [A presumption calculating formula of the X-ray spectrum generated from a molybdenum target X-ray tube].
    Kato H; Fujii S; Shirakawa S; Suzuki Y; Nishii Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 21471675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Calculation of x-ray spectra emerging from an x-ray tube. Part II. X-ray production and filtration in x-ray targets.
    Poludniowski GG
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2175-86. PubMed ID: 17654920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monte Carlo generated mammograms: development and validation.
    Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Bakas A; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3341-57. PubMed ID: 9832020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A model for the energy and angular distribution of x rays emitted from an x-ray tube. Part II. Validation of x-ray spectra from 20 to 300 kV.
    Omar A; Andreo P; Poludniowski G
    Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):4005-4019. PubMed ID: 32593216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Simulations of X-ray spectra, half value layer, and mean energy from mammography using EGSnrc Monte Carlo and SpekPy.
    Ngoc Huy B; Van Dung P
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 Jan; 29(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 36215915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Off-axis x-ray spectra: a comparison of Monte Carlo simulated and computed x-ray spectra with measured spectra.
    Bhat M; Pattison J; Bibbo G; Caon M
    Med Phys; 1999 Feb; 26(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 10076989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.
    Shrestha S; Vedantham S; Karellas A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1969-1993. PubMed ID: 28075335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tungsten anode spectral model using interpolating cubic splines: unfiltered x-ray spectra from 20 kV to 640 kV.
    Hernandez AM; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042101. PubMed ID: 24694149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microdosimetric characterisation of 28 kVp Mo/Mo, Rh/Rh, Rh/Al, W/Rh and Mo/Rh mammography X ray spectra.
    Verhaegen F; Castellano IA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 99(1-4):393-6. PubMed ID: 12194338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimation of mean glandular dose for contrast enhanced digital mammography: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.
    Dance DR; Young KC
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 May; 59(9):2127-37. PubMed ID: 24699200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect on dose to computed tomography phantoms of varying the theoretical x-ray spectrum: a comparison of four diagnostic x-ray spectrum calculating codes.
    Caon M; Bibbo G; Pattison J; Bhat M
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):1021-7. PubMed ID: 9650192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
    Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experimental and Monte Carlo-simulated spectra of standard mammography-quality beams.
    David MG; Pires EJ; Bernal MA; Peixoto JG; Dealmeida CE
    Br J Radiol; 2012 May; 85(1013):629-35. PubMed ID: 22010026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Monte Carlo derivation of filtered tungsten anode X-ray spectra for dose computation in digital mammography.
    Paixão L; Oliveira BB; Viloria C; de Oliveira MA; Teixeira MH; Nogueira Mdo S
    Radiol Bras; 2015; 48(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 26811553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Monte Carlo modelling of radiotherapy kV x-ray units.
    Verhaegen F; Nahum AE; Van de Putte S; Namito Y
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Jul; 44(7):1767-89. PubMed ID: 10442712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. X-ray simulation with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE. Application to Quality Control.
    Pozuelo F; Gallardo S; Querol A; Verdú G; Ródenas J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():5777-80. PubMed ID: 23367242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Suitability of new anode materials in mammography: dose and subject contrast considerations using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4221-35. PubMed ID: 17153401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monte-Carlo simulation of a slot-scanning X-ray imaging system.
    Kulkarni M; Dendere R; Nicolls F; Steiner S; Douglas TS
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):284-9. PubMed ID: 26725256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimization of radiography applications using x-ray beams emitted by compact accelerators. Part I. Monte Carlo study of the hard x-ray spectrum.
    Marziani M; Taibi A; Di Domenico G; Gambaccini M
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4683-701. PubMed ID: 19928100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The determination of total filtration on mammographic X-ray sets.
    Robson KJ; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Apr; 65(772):334-8. PubMed ID: 1581792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.