BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10843256)

  • 41. The effects of prior knowledge on study-time allocation and free recall: investigating the discrepancy reduction model.
    Verkoeijen PP; Rikers RM; Schmidt HG
    J Psychol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 15751831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Describing places: what strategies are used?
    Peron E; Mazzoni G
    Memory; 1996 Sep; 4(5):535-54. PubMed ID: 8884745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Test of competing explanations of the bizarre response bias in recognition memory.
    Worthen JB; Eller LS
    J Gen Psychol; 2002 Jan; 129(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 12038493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Bizarreness and Typicality Effects of Color on Object Recognition Memory.
    Morita A; Kambara T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2021 Dec; 128(6):2469-2489. PubMed ID: 34605317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Secondary distinctiveness effects: Orthographic distinctiveness andĀ bizarreness effects make independent contributions to memory performance.
    Gounden Y; Cerroti F; Nicolas S
    Scand J Psychol; 2017 Feb; 58(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 27859302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Bizarre imagery, interference, and distinctiveness.
    Einstein GO; McDaniel MA; Lackey S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jan; 15(1):137-46. PubMed ID: 2522138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Memory for frequency of bizarre and common stimuli: limitations of the automaticity hypothesis.
    Worthen JB; Hutchens SA; Nicodemus PD; Baker JD
    J Gen Psychol; 2002 Jul; 129(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 12224807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The bizarreness effect and visual imagery: No impact of concurrent visuo-spatial distractor tasks indicates little role for visual imagery.
    Besken M; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1281-1295. PubMed ID: 34351199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Task interruption and its effects on memory.
    Edwards MB; Gronlund SD
    Memory; 1998 Nov; 6(6):665-87. PubMed ID: 10320869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The time machine in our mind.
    Stocker K
    Cogn Sci; 2012 Apr; 36(3):385-420. PubMed ID: 22268721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness.
    McDaniel MA; Dornburg CC; Guynn MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Mar; 33(2):270-9. PubMed ID: 16028582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Figural vividness and persuasion: capturing the "elusive" vividness effect.
    Guadagno RE; Rhoads KV; Sagarin BJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 May; 37(5):626-38. PubMed ID: 21383069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The bizarre imagery effect and intention to learn.
    Burns DJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1996 Jun; 3(2):254-7. PubMed ID: 24213877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Instability in memory phenomena: a common puzzle and a unifying explanation.
    McDaniel MA; Bugg JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Apr; 15(2):237-55. PubMed ID: 18488637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Presentation format and its effect on working memory.
    Goolkasian P; Foos PW
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Oct; 30(7):1096-105. PubMed ID: 12507374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Is external memory memory? Biological memory and extended mind.
    Michaelian K
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Sep; 21(3):1154-65. PubMed ID: 22608533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of repetition of mental operations on memory for occurrence and origin.
    Rabinowitz JC
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 2314231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Further constraints on the bizarreness effect: elaboration at encoding.
    Robinson-Riegler B; McDaniel MA
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Nov; 22(6):702-12. PubMed ID: 7808279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Different cognitive processes in two image-scanning paradigms.
    Borst G; Kosslyn SM; Denis M
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Apr; 34(3):475-90. PubMed ID: 16933758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [The effects of the item typicality for a script on memory for the text].
    Nakayachi K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1989 Feb; 59(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 2733273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.