These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1084386)
1. After Canterbury: the need for medical experts in the informed consent suit. Isele WP J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 May; 4(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 1084386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical malpractice: informed consent cases in "full-disclosure" jurisdictions. Seidelson DE Duquesne Law Rev; 1976; 14(3):309-47. PubMed ID: 11664631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A new standard for informed consent in medical malpractice cases--the role of the expert witness. Kopis WF St Louis Univ Law J; 1973; 18(2):256-69. PubMed ID: 11664280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Canterbury v. Spence--the case and a few comments. Murphy WJ Forum; 1976; 11(3):716-26. PubMed ID: 11664620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent. Penhallegon JR Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Survey of Washington law: informed consent needed for medical treatment. Gonzaga Law Rev; 1974; 10(1):204-10. PubMed ID: 11664423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act. Rosen MW Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):701-27. PubMed ID: 11664598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed. Kessenick LW; Mankin PA Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Doctors, defenses and the age of informed consent (second part). Ashe L Bol Asoc Med P R; 1973 Mar; 65(3):49-54. PubMed ID: 4532567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New trends in informed consent? Jaeckel LB Neb Law Rev; 1975; 54(1):66-92. PubMed ID: 11664487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Physicians and surgeons--malpractice--informed consent of patient: duty to inform patient to be established by expert medical testimony. Wash Law Rev; 1973 May; 48(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 11664248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The doctrine of informed consent--fact or fiction? Markham BB Forum; 1975; 10(3):1073-9. PubMed ID: 11664458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent. Halligan PD LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The ethics of informed consent: an overview. Plaut EA Psychiatr J Univ Ott; 1989 Sep; 14(3):435-8. PubMed ID: 2678183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent in Washington: expanded scope of material facts that the physician must disclose to his patient. Rauzi E Wash Law Rev; 1980 Jun; 55(3):655-75. PubMed ID: 11665260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability. Wallach DM; Berry SJ St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent: the patient as an individual. Trichter JG Forum; 1980; 15(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 11665241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]