BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10844848)

  • 1. The LMA 'ProSeal'--a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent.
    Brain AI; Verghese C; Strube PJ
    Br J Anaesth; 2000 May; 84(5):650-4. PubMed ID: 10844848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12553391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid?
    Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A
    Anesth Analg; 2000 Oct; 91(4):1017-20. PubMed ID: 11004067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients.
    Cook TM; Nolan JP; Verghese C; Strube PJ; Lees M; Millar JM; Baskett PJ
    Br J Anaesth; 2002 Apr; 88(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 12066729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
    Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comparison of the Proseal laryngeal mask to the standard laryngeal mask on anesthesized, non-relaxed patients].
    Braun U; Zerbst M; Füllekrug B; Gentzel I; Hempel V; Leier M; Peters T; Hobbensiefken G; Klein U; Heuser D; Weyland A; Rey D; Weirich C; Krier C
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2002 Dec; 37(12):727-33. PubMed ID: 12469285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C; Morris R; Mecklem D
    Anesth Analg; 1998 Oct; 87(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 9768795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
    Xue FS; Mao P; Liu HP; Yang QY; Li CW; He N; Xu YC; Liao X
    Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 18699873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Airway protection with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2001 Jun; 29(3):288-91. PubMed ID: 11439803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway during manual in-line stabilisation of the neck.
    Asai T; Murao K; Shingu K
    Anaesthesia; 2002 Sep; 57(9):918-20. PubMed ID: 12190759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [First clinical impressions of ProSeal laryngeal mask].
    Murashima K; Yoshino H; Matsumoto T; Fukutome T
    Masui; 2002 Jun; 51(6):677-82. PubMed ID: 12134664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Techniques for the insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the Foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study.
    Chen MK; Hsu HT; Lu IC; Shih CK; Shen YC; Tseng KY; Cheng KI
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2014; 14():105. PubMed ID: 25435806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J
    Br J Anaesth; 2000 Aug; 85(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 10992836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children.
    Shimbori H; Ono K; Miwa T; Morimura N; Noguchi M; Hiroki K
    Br J Anaesth; 2004 Oct; 93(4):528-31. PubMed ID: 15298876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the reusable Classic laryngeal mask airway and the single-use Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway.
    Hanning SJ; McCulloch TJ; Orr B; Anderson SP
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2006 Apr; 34(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 16617647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gum-elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a new technique.
    Howath A; Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2002 Oct; 30(5):624-7. PubMed ID: 12413264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.
    Maitra S; Baidya DK; Arora MK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical comparison of the reusable LMA Classic laryngeal mask and the disposable Soft Seal mask in adult patients].
    López AM; Valero R; Pons M; Salvador L; de Riva N; Gomar C
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2007 Oct; 54(8):462-8. PubMed ID: 17993094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal tube airway versus ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Jun; 38(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 12759874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.