122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10844867)
1. A digital density equalization technique to improve visualization of breast periphery in mammography.
Stefanoyiannis AP; Costaridou L; Sakellaropoulos P; Panayiotakis G
Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):410-20. PubMed ID: 10844867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A digital equalisation technique improving visualisation of dense mammary gland and breast periphery in mammography.
Stefanoyiannis AP; Costaridou L; Skiadopoulos S; Panayiotakis G
Eur J Radiol; 2003 Feb; 45(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 12536094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital mammography: novel applications.
Rafferty EA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):831-43, vii. PubMed ID: 17888772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying image quality at breast periphery vs mammary gland in mammography using wavelet analysis.
Costaridou L; Sakellaropoulos P; Stefanoyiannis AP; Ungureanu E; Panayiotakis G
Br J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 74(886):913-9. PubMed ID: 11675308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Normalization of local contrast in mammograms.
Veldkamp WJ; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Jul; 19(7):731-8. PubMed ID: 11055788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analytical description of the high and low contrast behavior of a scan-rotate geometry for equalization mammography.
Sabol JM; Plewes DB
Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):887-98. PubMed ID: 8798174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mass Detection in Mammographic Images Using Wavelet Processing and Adaptive Threshold Technique.
Vikhe PS; Thool VR
J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):82. PubMed ID: 26811073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Thickness correction of mammographic images by means of a global parameter model of the compressed breast.
Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):799-806. PubMed ID: 15250632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.
Pisano ED; Cole EB; Major S; Zong S; Hemminger BM; Muller KE; Johnston RE; Walsh R; Conant E; Fajardo LL; Feig SA; Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ; Williams MB; Aylward SR
Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30. PubMed ID: 10966717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A mammographic image analysis method to detect and measure changes in breast density.
Marias K; Behrenbruch C; Highnam R; Parbhoo S; Seifalian A; Brady M
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Dec; 52(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 15544906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A phantom-based evaluation of an exposure equalization technique in mammography.
Skiadopoulos S; Pierrakeas C; Costaridou L; Kalogeropoulou CP; Panayiotakis G
Br J Radiol; 1999 Oct; 72(862):977-85. PubMed ID: 10673949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A wavelet-based spatially adaptive method for mammographic contrast enhancement.
Sakellaropoulos P; Costaridou L; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 48(6):787-803. PubMed ID: 12699195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Area and volumetric density estimation in processed full-field digital mammograms for risk assessment of breast cancer.
Cheddad A; Czene K; Eriksson M; Li J; Easton D; Hall P; Humphreys K
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110690. PubMed ID: 25329322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B
J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Computer-assisted visualization of digital mammography images].
Funke M; Netsch T; Breiter N; Biehl M; Peitgen HO; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1999 Nov; 171(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 10619037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic breast density segmentation: an integration of different approaches.
Kallenberg MG; Lokate M; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2011 May; 56(9):2715-29. PubMed ID: 21464531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of wavelet analysis for contrast enhancement in mammography.
Sakellaropoulos P; Costaridou L; Cavouras D; Bezerianos A; Panayiotakis G
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():502-6. PubMed ID: 10179716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential.
Adler DD; Wahl RL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 7998538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
