122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10844867)
21. [Efficacy of storage phosphor-based digital mammography in diagnosis of breast cancer--comparison with film-screen mammography].
Kitahama H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 May; 51(5):547-60. PubMed ID: 1651472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Partial volume compensated reconstruction of three-dimensional mass shapes in mammographic images.
Shao L
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 17505871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Thickness-equalization processing for mammographic images.
Byng JW; Critten JP; Yaffe MJ
Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):564-8. PubMed ID: 9114122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mammographic scanning equalization radiography.
Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1505-15. PubMed ID: 8289735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of x-ray diffraction enhanced imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Liu C; Yan X; Zhang X; Yang W; Peng W; Shi D; Zhu P; Huang W; Yuan Q
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(2):419-27. PubMed ID: 17202624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Milosevic M; Jankovic D; Peulic A
Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(5):701-15. PubMed ID: 25059254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Physical evaluation of computed radiography as a mammographic X-ray imaging system.
Workman A; Cowen AR; Brettle DS
Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):988-96. PubMed ID: 8000844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantitative assessment of percent breast density: analog versus digital acquisition.
Harvey JA
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Dec; 3(6):611-6. PubMed ID: 15560719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Spatial recurrence analysis: a sensitive and fast detection tool in digital mammography.
Prado TL; Galuzio PP; Lopes SR; Viana RL
Chaos; 2014 Mar; 24(1):013106. PubMed ID: 24697368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A method for practical equalization mammography of the radiographically dense breast.
Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
Radiographics; 1995 Sep; 15(5):1191-202. PubMed ID: 7501859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mammographic images segmentation based on chaotic map clustering algorithm.
Iacomi M; Cascio D; Fauci F; Raso G
BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Mar; 14():12. PubMed ID: 24666766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement algorithms: a preference study.
Sivaramakrishna R; Obuchowski NA; Chilcote WA; Cardenosa G; Powell KA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jul; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 10882244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets.
Wang TC; Karayiannis NB
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Aug; 17(4):498-509. PubMed ID: 9845306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Digital Imaging of the Breast: Is a Synthetic View Better?
Jenks S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Apr; 108(4):. PubMed ID: 27038116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay.
Pisano ED; Cole EB; Hemminger BM; Yaffe MJ; Aylward SR; Maidment AD; Johnston RE; Williams MB; Niklason LT; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Kopans DB; Brown ME; Pizer SM
Radiographics; 2000; 20(5):1479-91. PubMed ID: 10992035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Nonlinear unsharp masking for mammogram enhancement.
Panetta K; Zhou Y; Agaian S; Jia H
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2011 Nov; 15(6):918-28. PubMed ID: 21843996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital and film mammography.
Keen JD
N Engl J Med; 2006 Feb; 354(7):765-7; author reply 765-7. PubMed ID: 16482674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms.
Bick U; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Doi K
Radiographics; 1996 Nov; 16(6):1403-11. PubMed ID: 8946544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
