These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10844867)

  • 41. Film or digital mammographic screening?
    Dershaw DD
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Oct; 353(17):1846-7. PubMed ID: 16251541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 1. Tissue and related risk factors.
    Heine JJ; Malhotra P
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Mar; 9(3):298-316. PubMed ID: 11887946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A segmentation technique to detect masses in dense breast digitized mammograms.
    Santos VT; Schiabel H; Góes CE; Benatti RH
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():210-3. PubMed ID: 12105730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Level set-based core segmentation of mammographic masses facilitating three stage (core, periphery, spiculation) analysis.
    Ball JE; Bruce LM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():819-24. PubMed ID: 18002082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Digital mammography: current state and future aspects.
    Fischer U; Hermann KP; Baum F
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 16132935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Positron emission mammographic instrument: initial results.
    Murthy K; Aznar M; Bergman AM; Thompson CJ; Robar JL; Lisbona R; Loutfi A; Gagnon JH
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):280-5. PubMed ID: 10751499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Using component technologies for web based wavelet enhanced mammographic image visualization.
    Sakellaropoulos P; Costaridou L; Panayiotakis G
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2000; 25(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 11086968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Digital and film mammography.
    Crystal P; Strano S
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Feb; 354(7):765-7; author reply 765-7. PubMed ID: 16481649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Processing of medical images using real-time optical Fourier processing.
    Panchangam A; Sastry KV; Rao DV; DeCristofano BS; Kimball BR; Nakashima M
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 11213918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mammographic feature enhancement by computerized image processing.
    Dhawan AP; Le Royer E
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1988; 27(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 3409679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A method for determination of optimal image enhancement for the detection of mammographic abnormalities.
    Puff DT; Pisano ED; Muller KE; Johnston RE; Hemminger BM; Burbeck CA; McLelland R; Pizer SM
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 Nov; 7(4):161-71. PubMed ID: 7858011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Enhanced-image mammography.
    McSweeney MB; Sprawls P; Egan RL
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1984; 90():79-89. PubMed ID: 6701386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Unsupervised feature selection in digital mammogram image using rough set theory.
    Thangavel K; Velayutham C
    Int J Bioinform Res Appl; 2012; 8(5-6):436-54. PubMed ID: 23060420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mammographic breast density and cancer risk: the radiological view.
    Yaffe M; Boyd N
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2005 Jul; 21 Suppl 1():6-11. PubMed ID: 16112949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 2. Serial breast tissue change and related temporal influences.
    Heine JJ; Malhotra P
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Mar; 9(3):317-35. PubMed ID: 11887947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [How to measure breast density?].
    Chopier J; Gibeault M; Salem C; Marsault C; Thomassin Naggara I
    J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 89(9 Pt 2):1151-5. PubMed ID: 18772799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Biofield potential simulation as a novel adjunt modality for continuous monitoring of breast lesions: a 3D numerical model.
    Ng EY; Ng WK; Acharya UR
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 18183519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms.
    Pisano ED; Zong S; Hemminger BM; DeLuca M; Johnston RE; Muller K; Braeuning MP; Pizer SM
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Nov; 11(4):193-200. PubMed ID: 9848052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Design of a Low-Cost Diffuse Optical Mammography System for Biomedical Image Processing in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
    Rivera-Fernández JD; Roa-Tort K; Stolik S; Valor A; Fabila-Bustos DA; de la Rosa G; Hernández-Chávez M; de la Rosa-Vázquez JM
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 37177594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Feature and contrast enhancement of mammographic image based on multiscale analysis and morphology.
    Wu S; Yu S; Yang Y; Xie Y
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():716948. PubMed ID: 24416072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.