179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10845521)
1. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment.
Berg WA; Campassi C; Langenberg P; Sexton MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1769-77. PubMed ID: 10845521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography?
Berg WA; D'Orsi CJ; Jackson VP; Bassett LW; Beam CA; Lewis RS; Crewson PE
Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):871-80. PubMed ID: 12202727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.
Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification.
Gülsün M; Demirkazik FB; Ariyürek M
Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 12927667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms.
Redondo A; Comas M; Macià F; Ferrer F; Murta-Nascimento C; Maristany MT; Molins E; Sala M; Castells X
Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A dedicated BI-RADS training programme: effect on the inter-observer variation among screening radiologists.
Timmers JM; van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ; Verbeek AL; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2184-8. PubMed ID: 21899969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver Variability Between Breast Imagers Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS MRI Lexicon.
Grimm LJ; Anderson AL; Baker JA; Johnson KS; Walsh R; Yoon SC; Ghate SV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1120-4. PubMed ID: 25905951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Frankel SD; Ominsky SH; Sickles EA; Ernster V
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1801-9. PubMed ID: 9839520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Apruzzese A; Bassetti E; Brancato B; Carozzi F; Catarzi S; Lamberini MP; Marcelli G; Pellizzoni R; Pesce B; Risso G; Russo F; Scorsolini A
Breast; 2005 Aug; 14(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 16085233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Potential Use of American College of Radiology BI-RADS Mammography Atlas for Reporting and Assessing Lesions Detected on Dedicated Breast CT Imaging: Preliminary Study.
Jung HK; Kuzmiak CM; Kim KW; Choi NM; Kim HJ; Langman EL; Yoon S; Steen D; Zeng D; Gao F
Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1395-1401. PubMed ID: 28728854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of mammographic classifications for non-palpable suspect lesions with microcalcifications.
Pijnappel RM; Peeters PH; Hendriks JH; Mali WP
Br J Radiol; 2004 Apr; 77(916):312-4. PubMed ID: 15107321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.
Liberman L; Abramson AF; Squires FB; Glassman JR; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observer agreement using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-ultrasound, First Edition (2003).
Park CS; Lee JH; Yim HW; Kang BJ; Kim HS; Jung JI; Jung NY; Kim SH
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 17923782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Soo MS; Walsh R; Mengoni P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1621-5. PubMed ID: 10350302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: invasive carcinomas as focal masses.
Kim SJ; Morris EA; Liberman L; Ballon DJ; La Trenta LR; Hadar O; Abramson A; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):551-7. PubMed ID: 11517046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objectivity and accuracy of mammogram interpretation using the BI-RADS final assessment categories in 40- to 49-year-old women.
McKay C; Hart CL; Erbacher G
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2000 Oct; 100(10):615-20. PubMed ID: 11105450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment.
Ooms EA; Zonderland HM; Eijkemans MJ; Kriege M; Mahdavian Delavary B; Burger CW; Ansink AC
Breast; 2007 Dec; 16(6):568-76. PubMed ID: 18035541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
