These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10845521)

  • 1. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment.
    Berg WA; Campassi C; Langenberg P; Sexton MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1769-77. PubMed ID: 10845521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
    Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography?
    Berg WA; D'Orsi CJ; Jackson VP; Bassett LW; Beam CA; Lewis RS; Crewson PE
    Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):871-80. PubMed ID: 12202727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
    Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
    Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.
    Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification.
    Gülsün M; Demirkazik FB; Ariyürek M
    Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 12927667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms.
    Redondo A; Comas M; Macià F; Ferrer F; Murta-Nascimento C; Maristany MT; Molins E; Sala M; Castells X
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A dedicated BI-RADS training programme: effect on the inter-observer variation among screening radiologists.
    Timmers JM; van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ; Verbeek AL; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2184-8. PubMed ID: 21899969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interobserver Variability Between Breast Imagers Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS MRI Lexicon.
    Grimm LJ; Anderson AL; Baker JA; Johnson KS; Walsh R; Yoon SC; Ghate SV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1120-4. PubMed ID: 25905951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Frankel SD; Ominsky SH; Sickles EA; Ernster V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1801-9. PubMed ID: 9839520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Apruzzese A; Bassetti E; Brancato B; Carozzi F; Catarzi S; Lamberini MP; Marcelli G; Pellizzoni R; Pesce B; Risso G; Russo F; Scorsolini A
    Breast; 2005 Aug; 14(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 16085233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential Use of American College of Radiology BI-RADS Mammography Atlas for Reporting and Assessing Lesions Detected on Dedicated Breast CT Imaging: Preliminary Study.
    Jung HK; Kuzmiak CM; Kim KW; Choi NM; Kim HJ; Langman EL; Yoon S; Steen D; Zeng D; Gao F
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1395-1401. PubMed ID: 28728854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of mammographic classifications for non-palpable suspect lesions with microcalcifications.
    Pijnappel RM; Peeters PH; Hendriks JH; Mali WP
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Apr; 77(916):312-4. PubMed ID: 15107321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.
    Liberman L; Abramson AF; Squires FB; Glassman JR; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Observer agreement using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-ultrasound, First Edition (2003).
    Park CS; Lee JH; Yim HW; Kang BJ; Kim HS; Jung JI; Jung NY; Kim SH
    Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 17923782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
    Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment.
    Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Soo MS; Walsh R; Mengoni P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1621-5. PubMed ID: 10350302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: invasive carcinomas as focal masses.
    Kim SJ; Morris EA; Liberman L; Ballon DJ; La Trenta LR; Hadar O; Abramson A; Dershaw DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):551-7. PubMed ID: 11517046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objectivity and accuracy of mammogram interpretation using the BI-RADS final assessment categories in 40- to 49-year-old women.
    McKay C; Hart CL; Erbacher G
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2000 Oct; 100(10):615-20. PubMed ID: 11105450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment.
    Ooms EA; Zonderland HM; Eijkemans MJ; Kriege M; Mahdavian Delavary B; Burger CW; Ansink AC
    Breast; 2007 Dec; 16(6):568-76. PubMed ID: 18035541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.