These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10845521)

  • 41. Lexicon for standardized interpretation of gamma camera molecular breast imaging: observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy.
    Conners AL; Hruska CB; Tortorelli CL; Maxwell RW; Rhodes DJ; Boughey JC; Berg WA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Jun; 39(6):971-82. PubMed ID: 22289959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mammography in the follow-up after breast-conserving treatment in cancer of the breast: suitability for mammographic interpretation, validity and interobserver variation.
    Jager JJ; Langendijk JA; Dohmen JP; Schreutelkamp IL; Volovics L; van Engelshoven JM; de Jong JM; Schouten LJ; Hupperets PS; Blijham GH
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jul; 68(811):754-60. PubMed ID: 7640932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Interpretation of positron emission mammography and MRI by experienced breast imaging radiologists: performance and observer reproducibility.
    Narayanan D; Madsen KS; Kalinyak JE; Berg WA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Apr; 196(4):971-81. PubMed ID: 21427351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Mammographic Breast Density in Pakistani Women, Factors Affecting It, and Inter-Observer Variability in Assessment.
    Fatima K; Mohsin F; Rao MO; Alvi MI
    Cureus; 2021 Mar; 13(3):e14050. PubMed ID: 33898136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Asymmetric mammographic findings based on the fourth edition of BI-RADS: types, evaluation, and management.
    Youk JH; Kim EK; Ko KH; Kim MJ
    Radiographics; 2009; 29(1):e33. PubMed ID: 19036720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reliability of the BI-RADS Final Assessment Categories and Management Recommendations in a Telemammography Context.
    Salazar AJ; Romero JA; Bernal OA; Moreno AP; Velasco SC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 May; 14(5):686-692.e2. PubMed ID: 27815054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding--short interval follow-up suggested".
    Caplan LS; Blackman D; Nadel M; Monticciolo DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 9930778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of chemotherapy on the mammographic appearance of breast cancer and correlation with histopathology.
    Mistry KA; Thakur MH; Kembhavi SA
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1057):20150479. PubMed ID: 26495873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Variability of Breast Density Classification Between US and UK Radiologists.
    Alomaim W; O'Leary D; Ryan J; Rainford L; Evanoff M; Foley S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Mar; 50(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 30777249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Role of combined BI-RADS assessment using mammography and sonography for evaluation of incidental hypermetabolic lesions in the breast on 18F-FDG PET-CT.
    Lim S; Lee EH; Park JM; Chang YW; Kim HH; Jeong SH
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Dec; 54(10):1117-24. PubMed ID: 23864064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Predictors of interobserver agreement in breast imaging using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
    Antonio AL; Crespi CM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 20300960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A Bayesian network for mammography.
    Burnside E; Rubin D; Shachter R
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():106-10. PubMed ID: 11079854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Intrareader variability in mammographic diagnostic and perceptual performance amongst experienced radiologists in Australia.
    Pitman AG; Tan SY; Ong AH; Gledhill S; Tauro P; Lemish W; Waugh J; Padmanabhan M; Lui B; Hennessy O; Styles C; Pun E
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2011 Jun; 55(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 21696556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. International Interobserver Variability of Breast Density Assessment.
    Portnow LH; Choridah L; Kardinah K; Handarini T; Pijnappel R; Bluekens AMJ; Duijm LEM; Schoub PK; Smilg PS; Malek L; Leung JWT; Raza S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2023 Jul; 20(7):671-684. PubMed ID: 37127220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Semiautomatic estimation of breast density with DM-Scan software.
    Martínez Gómez I; Casals El Busto M; Antón Guirao J; Ruiz Perales F; Llobet Azpitarte R
    Radiologia; 2014; 56(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 23489767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading.
    Mello-Thoms C; Hardesty L; Sumkin J; Ganott M; Hakim C; Britton C; Stalder J; Maitz G
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 16039537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Intercountry analysis of breast density classification using visual grading.
    Damases CN; Hogg P; McEntee MF
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 90(1076):20170064. PubMed ID: 28613915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Is grading of breast fibrosis with mammography feasible?
    Hoeller U; Grzyska B; Lorenzen J; Kuhlmey A; Alberti W; Adam G
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 May; 181(5):307-12. PubMed ID: 15900426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Breast density assessment and organised breast cancer screening].
    Bambara AT; Ouédraogo NA; Ouédraogo PA; Bénao OLB; Ouédraogo W; Savadogo LGB; Ousséini D; Rabiou C
    Bull Cancer; 2023 Sep; 110(9):903-911. PubMed ID: 37468338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.