BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10846134)

  • 1. Effect of interference of metallic objects on interpretation of T1-weighted magnetic resonance images in the maxillofacial region.
    Abbaszadeh K; Heffez LB; Mafee MF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Jun; 89(6):759-65. PubMed ID: 10846134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.
    Zou YF; Chu B; Wang CB; Hu ZY
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 25544555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artifact reduction from metallic dental materials in T1-weighted spin-echo imaging at 3.0 tesla.
    Zho SY; Kim MO; Lee KW; Kim DH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Feb; 37(2):471-8. PubMed ID: 22941956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.
    Starcuková J; Starcuk Z; Hubálková H; Linetskiy I
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17884157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material.
    Eggers G; Rieker M; Kress B; Fiebach J; Dickhaus H; Hassfeld S
    MAGMA; 2005 May; 18(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 15785943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing metallic artifacts in postoperative spinal imaging: usefulness of IDEAL contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging--phantom and clinical studies.
    Cha JG; Jin W; Lee MH; Kim DH; Park JS; Shin WH; Yi BH
    Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):885-93. PubMed ID: 21386053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects.
    Costa AL; Appenzeller S; Yasuda CL; Pereira FR; Zanardi VA; Cendes F
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2009 Jun; 14(6):E278-82. PubMed ID: 19300375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metallic artifacts in MRI caused by dental alloys and magnetic keeper.
    Destine D; Mizutani H; Igarashi Y
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Apr; 52(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 18467793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artifacts from dental casting alloys in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Shafiei F; Honda E; Takahashi H; Sasaki T
    J Dent Res; 2003 Aug; 82(8):602-6. PubMed ID: 12885843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.
    Suh JS; Jeong EK; Shin KH; Cho JH; Na JB; Kim DH; Han CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1207-13. PubMed ID: 9798849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of the Static and Radiofrequency Magnetic Fields Produced by a 7T MR Imager on Metallic Dental Materials.
    Oriso K; Kobayashi T; Sasaki M; Uwano I; Kihara H; Kondo H
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2016; 15(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 25994037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of galvano-ceramic and metal-ceramic crowns on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Chen DP; Wu GY; Wang YN
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Jan; 123(2):208-11. PubMed ID: 20137372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of fat-saturated T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) at 3T.
    Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 32(8):1001-5. PubMed ID: 24925839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging metallic artifact of commonly encountered surgical implants and foreign material.
    Sutherland-Smith J; Tilley B
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 22277053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usefulness of slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) for reducing metallic artifacts in 3-T MRI.
    Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 31(5):703-6. PubMed ID: 23290476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of susceptibility artifacts produced on high-field magnetic resonance images by various biomaterials used for neurosurgical implants. Technical note.
    Matsuura H; Inoue T; Konno H; Sasaki M; Ogasawara K; Ogawa A
    J Neurosurg; 2002 Dec; 97(6):1472-5. PubMed ID: 12507151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
    Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative assessment of an MR technique for reducing metal artifact: application to spin-echo imaging in a phantom.
    Lee MJ; Janzen DL; Munk PL; MacKay A; Xiang QS; McGowen A
    Skeletal Radiol; 2001 Jul; 30(7):398-401. PubMed ID: 11499781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography caused by dental materials.
    Klinke T; Daboul A; Maron J; Gredes T; Puls R; Jaghsi A; Biffar R
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31766. PubMed ID: 22384071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metallic spinal artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Vaccaro AR; Chesnut RM; Scuderi G; Healy JF; Massie JB; Garfin SR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Jun; 19(11):1237-42. PubMed ID: 8073315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.