These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Generalizability of the results of randomized trials. Weiss NS; Koepsell TD; Psaty BM Arch Intern Med; 2008 Jan; 168(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 18227357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Alternatives to randomized controlled trials in telemedicine. Grigsby J; Bennett RE J Telemed Telecare; 2006; 12 Suppl 2():S77-84. PubMed ID: 16989679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized phase II trials with a prospective control. Jung SH Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):568-83. PubMed ID: 17573688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding and critiquing quantitative research papers. Lee P Nurs Times; 2006 Jul 11-17; 102(28):28-30. PubMed ID: 16869219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Designs for efficient clinical trials. Simon R Oncology (Williston Park); 1989 Jul; 3(7):43-9; discussion 51-3. PubMed ID: 2701811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guidelines for overcoming design problems in family planning operations research. Fisher AA; Laing J; Stoeckel J Stud Fam Plann; 1985; 16(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 3992609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The reporting of randomized controlled trials in prosthodontics. Jokstad A; Esposito M; Coulthard P; Worthington HV Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):230-42. PubMed ID: 12066485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005). Brown DC J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The quest for unbiased research: randomized clinical trials and the CONSORT reporting guidelines. Schulz KF Ann Neurol; 1997 May; 41(5):569-73. PubMed ID: 9153517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research corner: study synapses. Singh M Axone; 2005 Jun; 26(4):28. PubMed ID: 16028728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Experiences with the realisation of innovative study designs using the example of the HOPE-study]. Rangoonwala B Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Jul; 130 Suppl 2():S82-5. PubMed ID: 15988674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhancing the validity and utility of randomized clinical trials in addictions treatment research: I. Treatment implementation and research design. Del Boca FK; Darkes J Addiction; 2007 Jul; 102(7):1047-56. PubMed ID: 17567393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodologic points to consider. Labrecque M Can Fam Physician; 2004 Jun; 50():858. PubMed ID: 15233364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Fox guarding the clinical trial: internal vs. external validity in randomized studies. Goodwin PJ; Pritchard KI; Spiegel D Psychooncology; 1999; 8(3):275. PubMed ID: 10390742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of treatment preferences on validity: a review. Sidani S; Miranda J; Epstein D; Fox M Can J Nurs Res; 2009 Dec; 41(4):52-67. PubMed ID: 20191713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery. Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]