These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10846372)

  • 1. Violence risk assessment and risk communication: the effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats.
    Slovic P; Monahan J; MacGregor DG
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Jun; 24(3):271-96. PubMed ID: 10846372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk communication: clinicians' reported approaches and perceived values.
    Heilbrun K; Philipson J; Berman L; Warren J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):397-406. PubMed ID: 10509939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding Clinicians' Use of Cues When Assessing the Future Risk of Violence: A Clinical Judgement Analysis in the Psychiatric Setting.
    Brown B; Rakow T
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2016; 23(2):125-41. PubMed ID: 25652696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive accuracy of the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 for violence in forensic psychiatric wards in Japan.
    Arai K; Takano A; Nagata T; Hirabayashi N
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2017 Dec; 27(5):409-420. PubMed ID: 27296667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Patients in forensic and general psychiatry. Do risk assessment measures detect differing risks of future violence?].
    Lincoln TM; Hodgins S; Jöckel D; Freese R; Born P; Eucker S; Schmidt P; Gretenkord L; Müller-Isberner R
    Nervenarzt; 2006 May; 77(5):576-86. PubMed ID: 15944853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of actuarials at civil commitment hearings to predict the likelihood of future sexual violence.
    Berlin FS; Galbreath NW; Geary B; McGlone G
    Sex Abuse; 2003 Oct; 15(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 14571541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Forensic assessment of violence risk].
    Pujol Robinat A; Mohíno Justes S; Gómez-Durán EL
    Med Clin (Barc); 2014 Mar; 142 Suppl 2():16-23. PubMed ID: 24913749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools.
    Steadman HJ; Silver E; Monahan J; Appelbaum PS; Robbins PC; Mulvey EP; Grisso T; Roth LH; Banks S
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Feb; 24(1):83-100. PubMed ID: 10693320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expert approaches to communicating violence risk.
    Heilbrun K; O'Neill ML; Strohman LK; Bowman Q; Philipson J
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Feb; 24(1):137-48. PubMed ID: 10693323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of clinical training on violence risk assessment.
    McNiel DE; Chamberlain JR; Weaver CM; Hall SE; Fordwood SR; Binder RL
    Am J Psychiatry; 2008 Feb; 165(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18245189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth: A 4-year follow-up.
    Gammelgård M; Koivisto AM; Eronen M; Kaltiala-Heino R
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2015 Jul; 25(3):192-206. PubMed ID: 25042997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors of Mental Health Review Tribunal (MHRT) outcome in a forensic inpatient population: a prospective cohort study.
    Jewell A; Dean K; Fahy T; Cullen AE
    BMC Psychiatry; 2017 Jan; 17(1):25. PubMed ID: 28095806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive validity of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability for violent behavior in outpatient forensic psychiatric patients.
    Troquete NA; van den Brink RH; Beintema H; Mulder T; van Os TW; Schoevers RA; Wiersma D
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):377-91. PubMed ID: 25496088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An examination of violence risk communication in practice using a structured professional judgment framework.
    Storey JE; Watt KA; Hart SD
    Behav Sci Law; 2015 Feb; 33(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 25615811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Men in his category have a 50% likelihood, but which half is he in? Comments on Berlin, Galbreath, Geary, and McGlone.
    Harris G
    Sex Abuse; 2003 Oct; 15(4):389-92. PubMed ID: 14571543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Violence risk assessment in clinical settings: being sure about being sure.
    Buchanan A
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 23281104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting discharge in forensic psychiatry: the legal and psychosocial factors associated with long and short stays in forensic psychiatric hospitals.
    Ross T; Querengässer J; Fontao MI; Hoffmann K
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 22417759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Threat assessment: defining an approach for evaluating risk of targeted violence.
    Borum R; Fein R; Vossekuil B; Berglund J
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(3):323-37. PubMed ID: 10481132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cues they use: clinicians' endorsement of risk cues in predictions of dangerousness.
    Odeh MS; Zeiss RA; Huss MT
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 16557618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reliability of the Violence Risk Scale of Chinese version].
    Zhang XL; Chen XC; Cai WX; Hu JM
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 28(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 22435335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.