These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10846372)

  • 21. The validity of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) in predicting criminal recidivism.
    Kröner C; Stadtland C; Eidt M; Nedopil N
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2007; 17(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17295202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Brief checklists for assessing violence risk among patients discharged from acute psychiatric facilities: a preliminary study.
    Hartvig P; Alfarnes S; Ostberg B; Skjønberg M; Moger TA
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2006; 60(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16720517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of framing actuarial risk probabilities on involuntary civil commitment decisions.
    Scurich N; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 20145984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of the Brazilian version of HCR-20 Assessing Risk for Violence.
    Telles LE; Day VP; Folino JO; Taborda JG
    Braz J Psychiatry; 2009 Sep; 31(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 19787154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does using nonnumerical terms to describe risk aid violence risk communication? Clinician agreement and decision making.
    Zoe Hilton N; Carter AM; Harris GT; Sharpe AJ
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Feb; 23(2):171-88. PubMed ID: 18162635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) during residential treatment.
    Lodewijks HP; Doreleijers TA; de Ruiter C; Borum R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 18508122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multirater reliability of the historical, clinical, and risk management-20.
    Penney SR; McMaster R; Wilkie T
    Assessment; 2014 Feb; 21(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 24343237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Integrating DSM-IV factors to predict violence in high-risk psychiatric patients.
    Lynch DM; Noel HC
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 19840208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing normative approaches to communicating violence risk: a national survey of psychologists.
    Heilbrun K; O'Neill ML; Stevens TN; Strohman LK; Bowman Q; Lo YW
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 15048858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Shared Risk Formulation in Forensic Psychiatry.
    Ray I; Simpson AIF
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Mar; 47(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 30658965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. False prediction of future dangerousness: error rates and psychopathy checklist--revised.
    Freedman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 11302393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Projecting Risk: The Importance of the HCR-20 Risk Management Scale in Predicting Outcomes with Forensic Patients.
    Vitacco MJ; Tabernik HE; Zavodny D; Bailey K; Waggoner C
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Mar; 34(2-3):308-20. PubMed ID: 27009396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Housing Trajectories of Forensic Psychiatric Patients.
    Salem L; Crocker AG; Charette Y; Earls CM; Nicholls TL; Seto MC
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Mar; 34(2-3):352-65. PubMed ID: 27138216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of psychopathic personality disorder in violence risk assessments using the HCR-20.
    Guy LS; Douglas KS; Hendry MC
    J Pers Disord; 2010 Oct; 24(5):551-80. PubMed ID: 20958169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Risk of violence by psychiatric patients: beyond the "actuarial versus clinical" assessment debate.
    Buchanan A
    Psychiatr Serv; 2008 Feb; 59(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 18245161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Camilleri JA
    J Interpers Violence; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1063-74. PubMed ID: 15296617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric patients.
    Douglas KS; Ogloff JR; Hart SD
    Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Oct; 54(10):1372-9. PubMed ID: 14557523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factors influencing treatment team recommendations to review tribunals for forensic psychiatric patients.
    Martin K; Martin E
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jul; 34(4):551-63. PubMed ID: 27147124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preventing the unpredicted: managing violence risk in mental health care.
    Swanson JW
    Psychiatr Serv; 2008 Feb; 59(2):191-3. PubMed ID: 18245162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.
    Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR
    Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.