These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10847378)
1. A new needle-crystalline computed radiography detector. Leblans P; Struye L; Willems P J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):117-20. PubMed ID: 10847378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics. Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system. Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR. Neitzel U Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):32-8. PubMed ID: 15933078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance comparison of an active matrix flat panel imager, computed radiography system, and a screen-film system at four standard radiation qualities. Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):343-50. PubMed ID: 15789578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Digital radiography: from storage phosphor plates to direct detector systems]. Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Stadler A Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):30-4. PubMed ID: 12621834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimisation of radiological protocols for chest imaging using computed radiography and flat-panel X-ray detectors. Compagnone G; Casadio Baleni M; Di Nicola E; Valentino M; Benati M; Calzolaio LF; Oberhofer N; Fabbri E; Domenichelli S; Barozzi L Radiol Med; 2013 Jun; 118(4):540-54. PubMed ID: 23090253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies. Fischbach F; Ricke J; Freund T; Werk M; Spors B; Baumann C; Pech MJ; Felix R Invest Radiol; 2002 Nov; 37(11):609-14. PubMed ID: 12393973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures. Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Flat-panel detectors in X-ray systems]. Spahn M; Heer V; Freytag R Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):340-50. PubMed ID: 12764582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of dose reduction using needle-structured image plates versus powder-structured plates for computed radiography of the knee. Gruber M; Weber M; Homolka P; Nemec S; Fruehwald-Pallamar J; Uffmann M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):W318-23. PubMed ID: 21785059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography]. Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging. Baba R; Ueda K; Okabe M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15585803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of focal spot size with slit camera using computed radiography and flat-panel based digital detectors. Rong XJ; Krugh KT; Shepard SJ; Geiser WR Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1768-75. PubMed ID: 12906194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]