These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10847389)

  • 1. Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devices.
    Wang J; Anderson J; Lane T; Stetson C; Moore J
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):162-7. PubMed ID: 10847389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study.
    Wang J; Compton K; Peng Q
    J Digit Imaging; 2003 Jun; 16(2):185-202. PubMed ID: 12964056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality control of cathode-ray tube monitors for medical imaging using a simple photometer.
    Parsons DM; Kim Y; Haynor DR
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 7734525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SoftCopy Display Quality Assurance Program at Texas Children's Hospital.
    Ly CK
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():33-40. PubMed ID: 12105695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of monitor conditions for the display of radiological diagnostic images and ambient lighting.
    Wade C; Brennan PC
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 77(918):465-71. PubMed ID: 15151966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.
    Samei E; Badano A; Chakraborty D; Compton K; Cornelius C; Corrigan K; Flynn MJ; Hemminger B; Hangiandreou N; Johnson J; Moxley-Stevens DM; Pavlicek W; Roehrig H; Rutz L; Shepard J; Uzenoff RA; Wang J; Willis CE;
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1205-25. PubMed ID: 15895604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A practical approach to soft-copy display consistency for PC-based review workstations.
    Jervis SE; Brettle DS
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 76(909):648-52. PubMed ID: 14500280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems.
    Wang J; Langer S
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Nov; 10(4):158-68. PubMed ID: 9399169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resolution requirements for monitor viewing of digital flat-panel detector radiographs: a contrast detail analysis.
    Peer S; Giacomuzzi SM; Peer R; Gassner E; Steingruber I; Jaschke W
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Feb; 13(2):413-7. PubMed ID: 12599009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Active matrix liquid crystal displays for clinical imaging: comparison with cathode ray tube displays.
    Pavlicek W; Owen JM; Peter MB
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):155-61. PubMed ID: 10847388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of PACS display systems.
    Aldrich JE; Rutledge JD
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 16094505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of video gray-scale display.
    Nawfel RD; Chan KH; Wagenaar DJ; Judy PF
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 1508090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a flat CRT monitor for use in radiology.
    Roehrig H; Krupinski EA; Furukawa T
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Sep; 14(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 11720336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of ambient light and monitor brightness and contrast settings on the detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs: an in vitro study.
    Hellén-Halme K; Petersson A; Warfvinge G; Nilsson M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Oct; 37(7):380-4. PubMed ID: 18812599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of a cathode-ray-tube and film for display of computed radiographic images.
    Cook LT; Cox GG; Insana MF; McFadden MA; Hall TJ; Gaborski RS; Lure FY
    Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1132-8. PubMed ID: 9682198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of room lighting on grey-scale perception with a CRT-and a TFT monitor display.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Hellmich M; Nowak G; Noack MJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12058268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AAPM/RSNA tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview: display systems.
    Badano A
    Radiographics; 2004; 24(3):879-89. PubMed ID: 15143237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of the SMPTE test pattern in picture archiving and communication systems.
    Gray JE
    J Digit Imaging; 1992 Feb; 5(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 1554759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The performance of general-purpose colour CRT monitors in PACS environment.
    Kondoh H; Hatazawa K; Kozuka T
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2001 Jul; 66(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 11378224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.