These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10847729)
1. Commentary: delay in stopping treatment can become unreasonable and unfair. Fisher M; Raper RF BMJ; 2000 May; 320(7244):1268. PubMed ID: 10847729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Brain stem death: managing care when accepted medical guidelines and religious beliefs are in conflict. Consideration and compromise are possible. Inwald D; Jakobovits I; Petros A BMJ; 2000 May; 320(7244):1266-7. PubMed ID: 10797044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. "Brainstem death," "brain death" and death: a critical re-evaluation of the purported equivalence. Shewmon DA Issues Law Med; 1998; 14(2):125-45. PubMed ID: 9807242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Balancing need against donor rights. Brodeur D Issues (St Louis Mo); 1993; 8(4):1-6. PubMed ID: 11653086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Making health care decisions for others. May WE Ethics Medics; 1997 Jun; 22(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11657442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy. Stell LK St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The family in end-of-life decisions. Poorman ML America (NY); 1994 Oct; 171(12):12-5. PubMed ID: 11659872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mediating life and death decisions. Hoffmann DE Ariz Law Rev; 1994; 36(4):821-77. PubMed ID: 11656438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An intimate passing: restoring the role of family and religion in dying. Boozang KM Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1997; 58(3):549-617. PubMed ID: 16086506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Redefining death in America, 1968. Stevens ML Caduceus; 1995; 11(3):207-19. PubMed ID: 8680949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Barney says "no. Potter R; Emmott H Bioethics Forum; 1998; 14(2):29-30. PubMed ID: 11657171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Minors, medical treatment, and interspousal disagreement: should Solomon split the child? Feigenbaum MS De Paul Law Rev; 1992; 41(3):841-84. PubMed ID: 11659593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Chicago opinion of marginal value. Parnisari EP Health Prog; 1988 Mar; 69(2):8, 10. PubMed ID: 11645605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Death and dying in Tennessee. McKenney EJ Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1977; 7(4):503-54. PubMed ID: 11663172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Advance medical directives: policy perspectives and practical experiences. Weinberg JK; Brod M J Ethics Law Aging; 1995; 1(1):15-35. PubMed ID: 11654484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical futility or the denial of death? Bresnahan JF Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 11643205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ancient answers to modern questions: death, dying, and organ transplants--a Jewish law perspective. Werber SJ J Law Health; 1996-1997; 11(1-2):13-44. PubMed ID: 10176239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Debating euthanasia in Belgium: part two. Schotsmans P; Broeckaert B Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(5):47-8. PubMed ID: 11645207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law. Tarantino LM Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Brazil mandates organ 'donation' for transplants. McDaniels A Christ Sci Monitor; 1998 Jan; ():1, 9. PubMed ID: 11647586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]