105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10848453)
1. Maintaining mobility.
Daus C
Rehab Manag; 1999; 12(5):58-61. PubMed ID: 10848453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Wheelchairs, walkers, and canes: what does Medicare pay for, and who benefits?
Wolff JL; Agree EM; Kasper JD
Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; 24(4):1140-9. PubMed ID: 16012154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Canes, crutches and home care services: the interplay of human and technological assistance.
Allen SM
Policy Brief (Cent Home Care Policy Res); 2001; (4):1-6. PubMed ID: 14997879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic personal aids for mobility and monitoring for the elderly.
Spenko M; Yu H; Dubowsky S
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Sep; 14(3):344-51. PubMed ID: 17009494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current uses of mobility aids.
Allison BJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980 May; (148):62-9. PubMed ID: 7379412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of devices for mobility by the elderly.
Brooks LL; Wertsch JJ; Duthie EH
Wis Med J; 1994 Jan; 93(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 8160480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ambulation aids for the elderly.
Cress RH
Med Instrum; 1982; 16(3):169-70. PubMed ID: 7110001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Can use of walkers or canes impede lateral compensatory stepping movements?
Bateni H; Heung E; Zettel J; McLlroy WE; Maki BE
Gait Posture; 2004 Aug; 20(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 15196524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Geriatric assistive devices.
Bradley SM; Hernandez CR
Am Fam Physician; 2011 Aug; 84(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 21842786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors affecting the activity spaces of people who use mobility devices to get around the community.
Prescott M; Miller WC; Routhier F; Mortenson WB
Health Place; 2020 Jul; 64():102375. PubMed ID: 32838892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Home care. When your patient needs a cane, walker, or wheelchair.
Selcher D
RN; 1987 Dec; 50(12):60. PubMed ID: 3685816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A changing environment.
Pynoos J; Overton J
Rehab Manag; 2003 Mar; 16(2):38-42. PubMed ID: 12741248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Considering power.
Gilinsky G; Cody P; Hosack KR
Rehab Manag; 2008 Nov; 21(9):14-7. PubMed ID: 19068966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Helping the helpless: assistive technologies for the elderly & disabled.
Ott WE
JEMS; 2003 Sep; 28(9):127-9. PubMed ID: 13679846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Aids to mobility. Walking aids, wheelchairs, and hoists.
Grant WR
Physiotherapy; 1966 May; 52(5):146-50. PubMed ID: 5934306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Working in the field of aging policy.
Hyde J
J Aging Soc Policy; 1991; 3(1-2):9-12. PubMed ID: 10186785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality indicators for falls and mobility problems in vulnerable elders.
Chang JT; Ganz DA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2007 Oct; 55 Suppl 2():S327-34. PubMed ID: 17910554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The science behind mobility devices for individuals with multiple sclerosis.
Fay BT; Boninger ML
Med Eng Phys; 2002 Jul; 24(6):375-83. PubMed ID: 12135646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [M.S. and rehabilitation].
Angenot E
Tijdschr Ziekenverpl; 1982 Oct; 35(21):692-5. PubMed ID: 6924455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the options. The pros and cons of dependent mobility systems.
Lange ML
Rehab Manag; 2002 Feb; 15(1):20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 15892305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
