These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10848701)

  • 1. Intravasal azoospermia: a surgical dilemma.
    Sheynkin YR; Chen ME; Goldstein M
    BJU Int; 2000 Jun; 85(9):1089-92. PubMed ID: 10848701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes for vasovasostomy with bilateral intravasal azoospermia.
    Kolettis PN; D'Amico AM; Box L; Burns JR
    J Androl; 2003; 24(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 12514075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The significance of intravasal azoospermia during vasovasostomy: answer to a surgical dilemma.
    Sharlip ID
    Fertil Steril; 1982 Oct; 38(4):496-8. PubMed ID: 7117577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microscopic visualization of intravasal spermatozoa is positively associated with patency after bilateral microsurgical vasovasostomy.
    Ramasamy R; Mata DA; Jain L; Perkins AR; Marks SH; Lipshultz LI
    Andrology; 2015 May; 3(3):532-5. PubMed ID: 25914288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes for vasovasostomy performed when only sperm parts are present in the vasal fluid.
    Kolettis PN; Burns JR; Nangia AK; Sandlow JI
    J Androl; 2006; 27(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 16582406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between intravasal sperm quality and patency rates after vasovasostomy.
    Sigman M
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):307-9. PubMed ID: 14665901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vasovasostomy: kinetics and predictors of patency.
    Farber NJ; Flannigan R; Srivastava A; Wang H; Goldstein M
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Apr; 113(4):774-780.e3. PubMed ID: 32228879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vasovasostomy in the convoluted vas deferens: indications and outcomes.
    Sandlow JI; Kolettis PN
    J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):540-2. PubMed ID: 15643242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intravasal "toothpaste" in men with obstructive azoospermia is derived from vasal epithelium, not sperm.
    Anger JT; Goldstein M
    J Urol; 2004 Aug; 172(2):634-6. PubMed ID: 15247749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Efficacy of microsurgical vasectomy reversal on patients after vasectomy].
    Peng J; Yuan YM; Song WD; Cui WS; Zhang ZC; Li JJ; Gao B; Xin ZC
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Aug; 45(4):597-9. PubMed ID: 23939170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The significance of sperm heads and tails within the vasal fluid during vasectomy reversal.
    Smith RP; Khanna A; Kovac JR; Badhiwala N; Coward R; Lipshultz LI
    Indian J Urol; 2014 Apr; 30(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 24744514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of outcomes of vasovasostomy performed in the convoluted and straight vas deferens.
    Patel SR; Sigman M
    J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):256-9. PubMed ID: 18001786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Secondary azoospermia after vasovasostomy.
    Kolettis PN; Fretz P; Burns JR; D'amico AM; Box LC; Sandlow JI
    Urology; 2005 May; 65(5):968-71. PubMed ID: 15882733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Factors affecting the results of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy].
    Peng J; Yuan YM; Zhang ZC; Gao B; Song WD; Xin ZC; Guo YL; Jin J
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Aug; 43(4):562-4. PubMed ID: 21844967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Retrospective analysis of factors affecting patency rates and causes of failure in use of single-armed two-suture microsurgical vasoepididymostomy].
    Tang SX; Zhou HL; Ding YL; Yang P; Chen Q; Chen X
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Dec; 98(46):3741-3745. PubMed ID: 30541214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modified one-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy in vasectomized patients.
    Fuse H; Kimura H; Katayama T
    Int Urol Nephrol; 1995; 27(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 8586520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors predicting overall success: a review of 747 microsurgical vasovasostomies.
    Bolduc S; Fischer MA; Deceuninck G; Thabet M
    Can Urol Assoc J; 2007 Nov; 1(4):388-94. PubMed ID: 18542824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Vasovasostomy after vasectomy. The surgical results 1986-1989].
    Noldus J; Otto U; Salamon J; Schulze W; Klosterhalfen H
    Urologe A; 1992 Mar; 31(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 1561725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microsurgical vasovasostomy after failed vasovasostomy.
    Paick JS; Park JY; Park DW; Park K; Son H; Kim SW
    J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):1052-5. PubMed ID: 12576844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Obstructive azoospermia treated by epididymovasostomy following vasovasostomy: a case report].
    Matsuda T; Nonomura M; Shichiri Y; Nishimura K; Hida S; Okada Y; Okada K; Yoshida O
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 May; 34(5):889-91. PubMed ID: 3177130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.